가토 기미아키(加藤公明)의 토론 수업 유형에 대한 분석과 평가Analysis and Evaluation of Types of Discussion-based Class Teaching by Kato Kimiaki
- Other Titles
- Analysis and Evaluation of Types of Discussion-based Class Teaching by Kato Kimiaki
- Authors
- 권오현
- Issue Date
- 2013
- Publisher
- 역사교육학회
- Keywords
- 가토 기미아키; 토론수업유형; 주체적 역사인식; 과학적 역사인식; 교사의 지도성; Kato Kimiaki; Types of Discussion-based Class Teaching; Independent Perception of History; Scientific Perception of History; Guidance by Teachers
- Citation
- 역사교육논집, no.51, pp 235 - 263
- Pages
- 29
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 역사교육논집
- Number
- 51
- Start Page
- 235
- End Page
- 263
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/21338
- ISSN
- 1225-0775
- Abstract
- This paper is intended to analyze four discussion-based class teaching types that were originated and exercised by Kato Kimiaki, a history teacher at a highschool in Japan and to present implications and limitations of his teaching methodology by reviewing pros and cons in Japan. The implications of his discussion-based class teaching can be summed up in three aspects; individuality of learners, scientific perception of history and guidance by teacher. First, he created and has been utilizing various methods in order to ensure learners’ self-motivated study and nurture independent perception of history at each phase of discussion-based learning(teaching material selection, problem-posing, establishment of one’s views and discussion, follow-up guidance). Second, he has been promoting scientific perception of history by letting students experience study process of historians and debates in the academia of history. And students comes to learn how to perceive history scientifically based on logicality, objectivity and individuality/ independence by going through the processes of establishing their own views and of mutual criticism. Third, strong guidance by teachers who have profound of knowledge of history, persistent study and research on efficient teaching approaches and deep understanding of the students plays as a critical factor in developing individuality and scientific perception of history by students. Meanwhile, his practice has limitations of failing to teach students basic knowledge of history through the method of comprehensive history. So it is required to be improved so as to pursue individuality of learners and systemicity of history in a balanced manner.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 사범대학 > 역사교육과 > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.