How powerful CEOs adopt antitakeover provisions?
- Authors
- Lee, Eunsuh; Kim, Chaehyun; Lee, Junyoup
- Issue Date
- Jun-2022
- Publisher
- Chapman & Hall
- Keywords
- Antitakeover provisions; CEO power; Managerial entrenchment hypothesis; Quiet life hypothesis
- Citation
- Applied Economics Letters, v.29, no.10, pp 910 - 914
- Pages
- 5
- Indexed
- SSCI
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Applied Economics Letters
- Volume
- 29
- Number
- 10
- Start Page
- 910
- End Page
- 914
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/1172
- DOI
- 10.1080/13504851.2021.1897510
- ISSN
- 1350-4851
1466-4291
- Abstract
- We investigate how powerful chief executive officers (CEOs) adopt antitakeover provisions (ATPs). Prior studies indicate that CEOs adopt ATPs to increase their private benefits and job security. However, our evidence reveals a nonmonotonic relationship between CEO power and ATPs. Specifically, relatively less powerful CEOs adopt more ATPs, supporting the managerial entrenchment hypothesis. However, when CEOs become sufficiently powerful, they adopt fewer ATPs, supporting the quiet life hypothesis. Overall, our findings support the notion that a simple linear relationship does not explain the effect of CEO power.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Business Administration > 회계세무학부 > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.