Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Litterfall and Nutrient Dynamics in Pine(Pinus rigida) and Larch(Larix leptolepis) PlantationsLitterfall and Nutrient Dynamics in Pine(Pinus rigida) and Larch(Larix leptolepis) Plantations

Other Titles
Litterfall and Nutrient Dynamics in Pine(Pinus rigida) and Larch(Larix leptolepis) Plantations
Authors
김춘식구교상변재경
Issue Date
Jun-2005
Publisher
한국산림과학회
Keywords
Larix leptolepis; litterfall; nutrient cycling; nutrient inputs; Pinus rigida; Larix leptolepis; litterfall; nutrient cycling; nutrient inputs; Pinus rigida
Citation
한국산림과학회지, v.94, no.5, pp 302 - 306
Pages
5
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
한국산림과학회지
Volume
94
Number
5
Start Page
302
End Page
306
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73489
ISSN
2586-6613
Abstract
Litterfall and nutrient inputs were measured in even-aged coniferous plantations (a 31-year-old Pinus rigida and a 31-year-old Larix leptolepis) on a similar site condition in the Forest Practice Research Center, Gyeonggi Province. Litterfall was collected monthly from circular littertraps (collecting area : 0.50 m2) for three years between April 1997 and February 2000. Average total annual litterfall was significantly higher for pine (5,802 kg/ha/yr) than for larch (4,562 kg/ha/yr) plantations. Needle litter in both plantations accounted for about 63% of total litterfall. Litterfall in the larch was distributed as follows: needle > other leaf > branch > miscellaneous > bark, while it was needle > miscellaneous > other leaf > branch > bark in the pine plantation. There was no temporal variation in needle litter, other leaf and bark during the 3 year study period. The concentrations of all nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) in needle litter were significantly higher in the larch than in the pine plantations. The annual nutrient concentration of needle litter in the larch varied among the years, whereas no year variation of needle litter was in the pine except for phosphorus (P). Nitrogen (N) and P inputs by needle litter were significantly higher for larch than for pine plantations established on a similar soil. The differences in N and P inputs were attributed to lower nutrient concentration in pine needle litter compared with larch needle litter, not to total needle litter mass. Annual inputs of nutrient in both plantations were not significantly different among years except for K of the larch although there was yearly different in needlefall mass and nutrient concentration during the 3-year observed period. The results indicate that the mechanisms of litterfall and nutrient inputs vary considerably between pine and larch plantations established on a similar site condition.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
농업생명과학대학 > 환경산림과학부 > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE