Cited 0 time in
Litterfall and Nutrient Dynamics in Pine(Pinus rigida) and Larch(Larix leptolepis) Plantations
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김춘식 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 구교상 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 변재경 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-03T01:00:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-03T01:00:45Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2005-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2586-6613 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73489 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Litterfall and nutrient inputs were measured in even-aged coniferous plantations (a 31-year-old Pinus rigida and a 31-year-old Larix leptolepis) on a similar site condition in the Forest Practice Research Center, Gyeonggi Province. Litterfall was collected monthly from circular littertraps (collecting area : 0.50 m2) for three years between April 1997 and February 2000. Average total annual litterfall was significantly higher for pine (5,802 kg/ha/yr) than for larch (4,562 kg/ha/yr) plantations. Needle litter in both plantations accounted for about 63% of total litterfall. Litterfall in the larch was distributed as follows: needle > other leaf > branch > miscellaneous > bark, while it was needle > miscellaneous > other leaf > branch > bark in the pine plantation. There was no temporal variation in needle litter, other leaf and bark during the 3 year study period. The concentrations of all nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) in needle litter were significantly higher in the larch than in the pine plantations. The annual nutrient concentration of needle litter in the larch varied among the years, whereas no year variation of needle litter was in the pine except for phosphorus (P). Nitrogen (N) and P inputs by needle litter were significantly higher for larch than for pine plantations established on a similar soil. The differences in N and P inputs were attributed to lower nutrient concentration in pine needle litter compared with larch needle litter, not to total needle litter mass. Annual inputs of nutrient in both plantations were not significantly different among years except for K of the larch although there was yearly different in needlefall mass and nutrient concentration during the 3-year observed period. The results indicate that the mechanisms of litterfall and nutrient inputs vary considerably between pine and larch plantations established on a similar site condition. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 5 | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국산림과학회 | - |
| dc.title | Litterfall and Nutrient Dynamics in Pine(Pinus rigida) and Larch(Larix leptolepis) Plantations | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Litterfall and Nutrient Dynamics in Pine(Pinus rigida) and Larch(Larix leptolepis) Plantations | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국산림과학회지, v.94, no.5, pp 302 - 306 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 한국산림과학회지 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 94 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 302 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 306 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART001114305 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Larix leptolepis | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | litterfall | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nutrient cycling | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nutrient inputs | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pinus rigida | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Larix leptolepis | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | litterfall | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nutrient cycling | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nutrient inputs | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pinus rigida | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
