학교운동부 예산분배 과정에서의 분배공정성 인식의 차이

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the fairness perceptions of budget allocations among school-based elite sport teams according to several variables such as gender, position (student-athletes vs. coaches), and types of sports (individual vs. team). A total of 366 usable surveys were collected from school-based elite sport teams in Gyeongsangnam-do. Data were analyzed with Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) using SPSS 22.0. Results of the current study were as follows: First, male participants significantly perceived more fairness in equality of treatment and equality of results than female participants. Second, coaches significantly perceived more fairness in seven distributive principles (equality of treatment, equality of results, equality of opportunity, athletic performance, efforts, need due to lack of result, need due to high operating costs) than student-athletes. Third, those in individual sports significantly perceived more fairness in five principles (equality of treatment, equality of results, equality of opportunity, athletic performance, need due to high operating costs) than those in team sports. Lastly, the most likely used principles at practical budget allocations were contribution-based principles such as ability and athletic performance. The findings of the current study would provide various meaningful and practical implications for sport managers and administrators who are directly involved in budget allocations. Specifically, the findings of this study would provide reasonable criteria when sport managers allocate budget among school-based elite sport teams. In addition, this study would contribute to the literature on distributive justice in a sport context by firstly examining the perception of fairness on budget allocation at Korean sport context.