Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Acute Heart Failure Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum: Phenotypes, Management, and Outcomes From Nationwide KorHF III Registryopen access

Authors
Lee HuijinKim Eung JuHan Seong WooPark Seong-MiKim HyungseopCho Myung-ChanAhn Hyo-SukShin Mi-SeungHwang Seok-JaeJeong Jin-OkYang Dong HeonHyun JunhoChoi Jin OhLee Hae-YoungYoo ByungSuKang Seok-MinChoi Dong-JuCho Hyun-Jai
Issue Date
Jan-2026
Publisher
대한심부전학회
Keywords
Heart failure; Acute disease; Hospitalization; Phenotype; Guideline adherence
Citation
International Journal of Heart Failure, v.8, no.1, pp 43 - 55
Pages
13
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
International Journal of Heart Failure
Volume
8
Number
1
Start Page
43
End Page
55
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/82389
DOI
10.36628/ijhf.2025.0061
ISSN
2636-154X
2636-1558
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Clinical characteristics and outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF) vary by phenotype. We assessed phenotype-specific features, treatment patterns, and outcomes in a nationwide Korean cohort. Methods: The Korean Heart Failure III registry prospectively enrolled 7,351 AHF admissions at 47 hospitals. Among 6,777 patients with available left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), phenotypes were defined as heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF, ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, 41–49%), or preserved EF (HFpEF, ≥50%). The primary endpoint was a 12-month composite of all-cause death or heart transplantation, evaluated from index admission and, among hospital survivors, from discharge. We used inverse probability weighting (multinomial generalized boosted models with stabilized, trimmed weights) and weighted Cox proportional-hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Phenotype distribution was 58.9% HFrEF, 13.6% HFmrEF, and 27.5% HFpEF. Crude 12-month composite rates from index admission were 13.4% (HFrEF), 12.7% (HFmrEF), and 16.8% (HFpEF). After weighting, from index admission, HFmrEF (HR, 0.892; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.731–1.088) and HFpEF (HR, 1.101; 95% CI, 0.939–1.291) did not differ from HFrEF; from discharge, HFpEF had modestly higher risk (HR, 1.207; 95% CI, 1.008–1.445) whereas HFmrEF did not (HR, 1.039; 95% CI, 0.844–1.279). Hyponatremia and chronic kidney disease were consistent adverse markers, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/ angiotensin II receptor blocker use at discharge was protective. Conclusions: Across the EF spectrum, phenotypes showed distinct profiles and risk. Postdischarge risk was modestly higher in HFpEF, supporting phenotype-tailored care and systematic discharge optimization in Korean patients with AHF.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE