Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Revisiting the Geriatric Depression Scale: An IRT-Based 10-Item Screen Outperforms the GDS-15 in Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency

Authors
Han, Ji WonOh, Dae JongKim, Tae HuiKwak, Kyung PhilKim, Bong JoKim, Shin GyeomKim, Jeong LanMoon, Seok WooPark, Joon HyukRyu, Seung-HoYoun, Jong ChulLee, Dong YoungLee, Dong WooLee, Seok BumLee, Jung JaeJhoo, Jin HyeongKim, Ki Woong
Issue Date
Jan-2026
Publisher
MDPI AG
Keywords
depression; screening; item response theory; geriatric depression scale; psychometrics
Citation
Journal of Clinical Medicine, v.15, no.2
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Volume
15
Number
2
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/82347
DOI
10.3390/jcm15020473
ISSN
2077-0383
Abstract
Background/Objective: Existing abbreviated Geriatric Depression Scales (GDSs), derived via Classical Test Theory (CTT), often sacrifice accuracy for brevity and retain non-specific items. We aimed to develop a minimum-item GDS maintaining diagnostic performance equivalent to the full 30-item scale (GDS30) using Item Response Theory (IRT). Methods: This cross-sectional study employed rigorous 5:5 split-sample cross-validation. Participants included 6525 older adults (aged >= 60 years) from community-based (Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia) and clinical settings (geropsychiatry clinic). Depression was diagnosed through standardized clinical interviews based on DSM-IV criteria. Two-parameter logistic IRT models estimated item discrimination and difficulty parameters. Sequential item reduction with DeLong tests identified the minimum number of items required to maintain GDS30-equivalent area under the curve (AUC). Results: The 10-item IRT-optimized scale (GDS10-IRT) achieved an AUC of 0.856 (95% CI: 0.809-0.895) in the validation set, showing no significant difference from GDS30 (AUC = 0.883; p = 0.396). Conversely, the 15-item GDS (GDS15) demonstrated significantly lower AUC than GDS30 (p < 0.001) despite having more items. GDS10-IRT achieved a 234% improvement in efficiency ratio (AUC/items) over GDS30. Notably, Item 16 ("feeling downhearted and blue"), identified as the most discriminating symptom (a = 2.53), is absent from the GDS15 but included in GDS10-IRT. Conclusions: IRT-based item selection achieves GDS30-equivalent diagnostic accuracy with only 10 items, outperforming the widely used GDS15. By recovering high-discrimination items excluded by CTT, the GDS10-IRT offers a more efficient, specific screening tool for late-life depression.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Bong Cho photo

Kim, Bong Cho
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE