Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

농경지 양분수지의 개선 가치 분석:진술선호법과 대체비용법의 비교Analysis of the Value of Improving Farmland Nutrient Balances:A Comparison of Stated Preference and Replacement Cost Methods

Other Titles
Analysis of the Value of Improving Farmland Nutrient Balances:A Comparison of Stated Preference and Replacement Cost Methods
Authors
김태영박혜진김길원
Issue Date
Nov-2025
Publisher
한국유기농업학회
Keywords
excess effluent charges; nutrient balance; public value; purification cost; replacement cost method; stated preference method
Citation
한국유기농업학회지, v.33, no.4, pp 469 - 487
Pages
19
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
한국유기농업학회지
Volume
33
Number
4
Start Page
469
End Page
487
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/81322
ISSN
1229-3571
2287-819X
Abstract
This study estimated the public value of agricultural nutrient balance improvement using the Replacement Cost Method (RCM) and comparatively analyzed it with the pre-existing stated preference method results to explore strategies for complementary utilization of the two valuation approaches. The public value of nutrient balance improvement through the statement preference method was estimated based on the total economic value derived from the public’s willingness to pay for the environmental quality improvement effect—the ultimate outcome of nutrient balance improvement (Outcome Indicator). The RCM quantified the avoided costs (output indicators) required to clean up the reduced pollutant runoff from the recommended and standard fertilization methods using the DNDC model, thereby measuring the minimum technical value as a public value. Key research findings showed that the public benefit value estimated using the stated preference method (KRW 253.68 billion per year) was higher than the public benefit value (KRW 208.856 billion per year) derived using the replacement cost method (based on recommended fertilization and purification costs). Furthermore, the total public benefit value of the recommended fertilization method (KRW 208.856 billion based on purification costs) was approximately 1.25 times higher than that of the standard fertilization method (KRW 167.313 billion). These results suggest that the two valuation methods should be utilized complementarily. Stated preference-based values ​​serve as benchmarks for establishing social legitimacy and long-term policy objectives. RCM values ​​are ideal for demonstrating technical efficiency and supporting early environmental investments. This quantitative approach provides a basis for prioritizing incentives for activities to improve nutrient balance in agricultural lands, enabling the design of differentiated incentives based on factors such as areas with high potential for reducing runoff from agricultural land and precision fertilization methods.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
농업생명과학대학 > 식품자원경제학과 > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Taeyoung photo

Kim, Taeyoung
농업생명과학대학 (식품자원경제학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE