Cited 0 time in
淸代 外藩蒙古 작위 세습과 능력주의
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 이선애 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-16T01:00:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-16T01:00:07Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1226-1270 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2173-8259 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/79452 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The Qing emperor reinforced both official and personal networks with Mongol princes through his authority over the granting and inheritance of noble titles, using this system as a continuous means of testing their loyalty and capabilities. Although title succession was based on lineage, in the case of Outer Mongolia under the Qing, contributions to and loyalty toward the emperor and the court served as the primary criteria for determining title rank and inheritance. During the pre-conquest period, when alliances with Inner Mongolia were essential, the timing, cause, and manner of defection to the Later Jin, as well as military contributions, influenced the treatment of Mongol aristocrats. Until the later Qianlong reign, when conquest wars were still ongoing, military achievements and logistical support capabilities were key factors in conferring, promoting, demoting, or revoking titles. Political and strategic considerations related to stabilizing Qing rule over Mongol territories also played a significant role in title decisions and changes. In title inheritance, the Qing prioritized military merit, granting the privilege of “perpetual hereditary succession”(世襲罔替) only to 功封 titles—that is, titles earned through distinguished service. In contrast, 恩封 titles, which were granted through imperial favor, were generally subject to inheritance at a reduced rank. Even when an individual’s title was revoked due to misconduct, the Qing emperor often allowed succession to continue within the same lineage, thereby maintaining a stable network with Mongol noble families. After the fall of the Zunghars, newly granted titles and dramatic shifts in title rank became less frequent, while the rights associated with hereditary succession expanded. Nevertheless, titles remained subject to revocation or demotion, and inheritance by descendants depended on the achievements of the predecessor or the successor’s own qualifications and abilities. While military merit was most highly valued during wartime, other forms of service and contributions were expected in the postwar period. Even after the expansion of hereditary privileges, Mongol elites had to continue demonstrating their loyalty and competence to preserve the honor of their individuals and lineages. The Qing title system, therefore, was not merely based on hereditary principles but functioned as a sophisticated mechanism combining lineage-based succession with meritocracy. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 38 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 동양사학회 | - |
| dc.title | 淸代 外藩蒙古 작위 세습과 능력주의 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Hereditary Titles and Meritocracy for Mongols during the Qing period | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 동양사학연구, no.171, pp 87 - 124 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 동양사학연구 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 171 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 87 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 124 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART003225117 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | waifan monggo (外藩蒙古) | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | investiture system | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | hereditary succession | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | meritocracy | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | titles earned through distinguished service | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | titles granted through imperial favor | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | perpetual hereditary succession | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 외번몽고 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 작위제도 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 승습 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 능력주의 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공봉 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 은봉 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 세습망체 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 外藩蒙古 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 封爵制度 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 承襲 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 能力主義 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 功封 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 恩封 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 世襲罔替 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
