Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Pravastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Common Data Model of Multicenter Electronic Health Records in South Korea

Authors
Chun, Sung WanKim, Hae JinSeo, Ji A.Chon, SukKim, Sung EunJung, Jung HwaKim, Sang SooLee, HyejinShin, SanghoonKim, So HunChoi, DughyunPark, Hyeong KyuKim, Soo-KyungBae, Ji-HwanJeong, In-Kyung
Issue Date
May-2025
Publisher
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
Keywords
Pravastatin; Atorvastatin; MACE; Hepatotoxicity; Real-world practice
Citation
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, v.32, no.10, pp 1268 - 1303
Pages
36
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis
Volume
32
Number
10
Start Page
1268
End Page
1303
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/78649
DOI
10.5551/jat.65345
ISSN
1340-3478
1880-3873
Abstract
Aim: To compare the effectiveness and safety of moderate-intensity pravastatin 40 mg/day and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of 19 million patients across 14 secondary/tertiary hospitals, standardized to a Common Data Model. New users of pravastatin (40 mg/ day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were identified. Six distinct cohorts were used to assess the comparative effectiveness in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the risks of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), myalgia or rhabdomyolysis, and hepatotoxicity (measured by aspartate aminotransferase [AST]/alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to each cohort for effectiveness and safety analyses, followed by a meta-analysis of hospital-specific results. Results: After PSM, patients were equally assigned to the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups for primary (n = 2,688/group) and secondary MACE prevention (n = 1,258/group) and to assess the risk of NODM (n = 2,391/ group), new-onset myalgia or rhabdomyolysis (n = 11,799/group), and hepatotoxicity (AST, n = 4,034/group; ALT, n = 3,655/group). No significant differences were observed in the hazard ratios (HRs) for primary (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) and secondary MACE prevention (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68-1.16). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of NODM (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.79-1.23). The risk of new-onset myalgia/rhabdomyolysis (HR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.96) and the incidence of abnormal elevations in AST levels (2.35% vs. 3.37%, p<0.05) were significantly lower in the pravastatin group. Conclusion: Moderate-intensity pravastatin (40 mg/day) showed comparable effectiveness to moderate-intensity atorvastatin (10 mg/day) in preventing MACE with a more favorable safety profile.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE