Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A prospective, crossover, randomized, double-blind clinical study comparing the effectiveness and ocular comfort of 0.1% hyaluronic acid and 0.3% hyaluronic acid in patients with dry eye diseaseopen access

Authors
Kim, Seong-JaeYoo, Woong-SunKwon, Lee-HaKim, Rock BumYoon, Hyeon-JeongYoon, Kyung Chul
Issue Date
Feb-2025
Publisher
Dove Medical Press Ltd
Keywords
0.1% hyaluronic acid; 0.3% hyaluronic acid; Dry eye disease
Citation
Clinical Ophthalmology, v.19, pp 407 - 416
Pages
10
Indexed
SCOPUS
ESCI
Journal Title
Clinical Ophthalmology
Volume
19
Start Page
407
End Page
416
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/77424
DOI
10.2147/OPTH.S489669
ISSN
1177-5467
1177-5483
Abstract
Purpose: Report the clinical effects and discomfort of using 0.1% hyaluronic acid (HA [Kynex 1®, Alcon, Seoul, S. Korea]) and 0.3% HA (Kynex 3®, Alcon, Seoul, S. Korea) to treat dry eye disease (DED). Methods: This study was designed as a prospective, crossover, randomized, and double-blind study. Patients aged >19 years with DED level 2 or higher, corneal staining score > 1, and tear break-up time (TBUT) < 10s were included. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in group 1 were instilled with 0.1% HA for four weeks and then 0.3% HA for the next four weeks. Group 2 patients were instilled with the eye drops in the reverse order of group 1. Patients were evaluated using a corneal staining score, TBUT, and the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. Results: In both groups, 0.3% HA showed an increasing trend in TBUT, although the difference was not statistically significant. Changes in the Schirmer test were greater in group 2, but this difference was also not statistically significant. The corneal staining score improved in both groups, with no statistically significant difference. While 0.3% HA was more effective than 0.1% HA according to the absolute value, this difference was not statistically significant. There was no difference between the two groups in the SPEED questionnaire evaluation that assessed aspects of discomfort, such as blurred vision, foreign body sensation, and burning sensation. Conclusion: 0.3% HA was more effective for treating DED, although the difference was not statistically significant. In terms of discomfort, 0.3% HA showed no difference compared to 0.1% HA. Using both 0.1% HA and 0.3% HA in a tailored treatment approach can improve patient comfort and treatment outcomes. Plain Language Summary: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition that causes discomfort and vision problems. This study aimed to find out how well two eye drops, using 0.1% hyaluronic acid (HA [Kynex 1®, Alcon, Seoul, S. Korea]) and 0.3% HA (Kynex 3®, Alcon, Seoul, S. Korea), work in treating DED and how comfortable they are for patients to use. We included 60 adults with moderate to severe DED and divided them into two groups. One group used 0.1% HA for four weeks and then switched to 0.3% HA for another four weeks, while the other group used the drops in the opposite order. We evaluated their symptoms and signs at the beginning, after four weeks, and after eight weeks using ophthalmologic examinations and a questionnaire. Both eye drops helped improve the symptoms of DED, with 0.3% HA being slightly more effective overall, although the difference was not significant. Both eye drops were similarly comfortable for the patients. The study shows that both 0.1% HA and 0.3% HA are effective treatments for DED. While 0.3% HA might have a slight edge in effectiveness, both drops can be used to improve patient comfort and outcomes. Using these eye drops in a personalized treatment plan can help people with DED manage their symptoms better and lead more comfortable lives. © 2025, Dove Medical Press Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의학계열 > 의학과 > Journal Articles
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Seong Jae photo

Kim, Seong Jae
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE