A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in De Novo Coronary Artery Diseaseopen access
- Authors
- Shin, Eun-Seok; Park, Yongwhi; Lee, Jong-Young; Her, Ae-Young; Chon, Min-Ku; Kim, Sunwon; Rha, Seung-Woon; Oh, Gyu Chul; Cho, Deok-Kyu; Kim, Bitna; Bae, Jang-Whan
- Issue Date
- Jan-2025
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Keywords
- drug-coated balloon; outcome; paclitaxel; percutaneous coronary intervention; randomized controlled trial
- Citation
- JACC: Asia, v.5, no.1P1, pp 15 - 24
- Pages
- 10
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
ESCI
- Journal Title
- JACC: Asia
- Volume
- 5
- Number
- 1P1
- Start Page
- 15
- End Page
- 24
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/75379
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.10.028
- ISSN
- 2772-3747
2772-3747
- Abstract
- Background: The Genoss paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is a novel PCB with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, enhancing drug delivery to the target lesion and minimizing restenosis. Objectives: This study aimed to compare quantitative coronary angiographic outcomes at 6 months after treatment of de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) with 2 different types of PCBs. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, noninferiority trial randomized 204 patients with chronic coronary syndrome or stabilized acute coronary syndrome to treatment with the shellac and vitamin E-based PCB or the reference PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was noninferiority for the 6-month angiographic in-lesion late lumen loss. Results: The 6-month in-lesion late lumen loss was 0.06 ± 0.38 mm with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 0.09 ± 0.36 mm with reference PCB. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.08 mm, which was lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.15 mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority = 0.001). There was comparable late lumen enlargement (44.7% vs 42.7%; P = 0.903) and binary restenosis rates (3.2% vs 6.7%; P = 0.442) following treatment with shellac and vitamin E-based PCB and reference PCB, respectively. Both PCBs had similar 12-month rates of target vessel failure (3.0% in shellac and vitamin E-based PCB vs 4.3% in reference PCB; P = 0.921). Conclusions: The Genoss PCB, formulated with shellac and vitamin E as excipients, demonstrated angiographic outcomes comparable to a clinically proven PCB in the treatment of de novo CAD. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions; NCT05096442) © 2025 The Authors
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.