Detailed Information

Cited 17 time in webofscience Cited 25 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Neurofeedback Treatment on Depressive Symptoms and Functional Recovery in Treatment-Resistant Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: an Open-Label Pilot Studyopen access

Authors
Lee, Young-JiLee, Ga-WonSeo, Wan-SeokKoo, Bon-HoonKim, Hye-GeumCheon, Eun-Jin
Issue Date
Nov-2019
Publisher
KOREAN ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
Keywords
Treatment-Resistant Depression; Neurofeedback; Functional Recovery
Citation
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, v.34, no.42
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume
34
Number
42
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73309
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e287
ISSN
1011-8934
1598-6357
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the effects of neurofeedback as an augmentation treatment on depressive symptoms and functional recovery in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods: We included 24 adult patients with TRD and 12 healthy adults. 24 TRD patients were assigned to the neurofeedback augmentation group (n = 12) and the medication-only (treatment as usual [TAU]) group (n = 12). The neurofeedback augmentation group underwent combined therapy comprising medication and 12-24 sessions of neurofeedback training for 12 weeks. To assess the serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in both groups, pre- and post-treatment blood samples were obtained. Patients were evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), 5-level version of European Quality of Life Questionnaire 5-Dimensional Classification (EQ-5D-5L), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at baseline, and at the 1-, 4-, and 12-week. Results: From baseline to week 12, neurofeedback training reduced mean scores on HAM-D, BDI-II, CGI-S, and SDS, and increased mean EQ-5D-5L tariff score. In the neurofeedback augmentation group, the response and remission rates were 58.3% and 50.0%, respectively, at week 12. Changes in HAM-D, EQ-5D-5L tariff score, and SDS were significantly larger in the neurofeedback group than in the medication-only (TAU) group. No significant difference in BDNF level was found pre- vs. post-treatment in any of the groups. Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, these results suggest that neurofeedback treatment may be effective as an augmentation treatment, not only for depressive symptoms, but also for functional recovery, in patients with TRD.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE