Improving Sensitivity on Identification and Delineation of Intracranial Hemorrhage Lesion Using Cascaded Deep Learning Modelsopen access
- Authors
- Cho, Junghwan; Park, Ki-Su; Karki, Manohar; Lee, Eunmi; Ko, Seokhwan; Kim, Jong Kun; Lee, Dongeun; Choe, Jaeyoung; Son, Jeongwoo; Kim, Myungsoo; Lee, Sukhee; Lee, Jeongho; Yoon, Changhyo; Park, Sinyoul
- Issue Date
- Jun-2019
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Keywords
- Cascaded deep learning model; Lesion segmentation; Sensitivity; CT window setting; Fully convolutional networks; Intracranial hemorrhage
- Citation
- JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, v.32, no.3, pp 450 - 461
- Pages
- 12
- Indexed
- SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING
- Volume
- 32
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 450
- End Page
- 461
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73044
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10278-018-00172-1
- ISSN
- 0897-1889
1618-727X
- Abstract
- Highly accurate detection of the intracranial hemorrhage without delay is a critical clinical issue for the diagnostic decision and treatment in an emergency room. In the context of a study on diagnostic accuracy, there is a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. In order to improve sensitivity while preserving specificity, we propose a cascade deep learning model constructed using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and dual fully convolutional networks (FCNs). The cascade CNN model is built for identifying bleeding; hereafter the dual FCN is to detect five different subtypes of intracranial hemorrhage and to delineate their lesions. Using a total of 135,974 CT images including 33,391 images labeled as bleeding, each of CNN/FCN models was trained separately on image data preprocessed by two different settings of window level/width. One is a default window (50/100[level/width]) and the other is a stroke window setting (40/40). By combining them, we obtained a better outcome on both binary classification and segmentation of hemorrhagic lesions compared to a single CNN and FCN model. In determining whether it is bleeding or not, there was around 1% improvement in sensitivity (97.91% [+/- 0.47]) while retaining specificity (98.76% [+/- 0.10]). For delineation of bleeding lesions, we obtained overall segmentation performance at 80.19% in precision and 82.15% in recall which is 3.44% improvement compared to using a single FCN model.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.