Detailed Information

Cited 102 time in webofscience Cited 128 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Improving Sensitivity on Identification and Delineation of Intracranial Hemorrhage Lesion Using Cascaded Deep Learning Modelsopen access

Authors
Cho, JunghwanPark, Ki-SuKarki, ManoharLee, EunmiKo, SeokhwanKim, Jong KunLee, DongeunChoe, JaeyoungSon, JeongwooKim, MyungsooLee, SukheeLee, JeonghoYoon, ChanghyoPark, Sinyoul
Issue Date
Jun-2019
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Cascaded deep learning model; Lesion segmentation; Sensitivity; CT window setting; Fully convolutional networks; Intracranial hemorrhage
Citation
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, v.32, no.3, pp 450 - 461
Pages
12
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING
Volume
32
Number
3
Start Page
450
End Page
461
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73044
DOI
10.1007/s10278-018-00172-1
ISSN
0897-1889
1618-727X
Abstract
Highly accurate detection of the intracranial hemorrhage without delay is a critical clinical issue for the diagnostic decision and treatment in an emergency room. In the context of a study on diagnostic accuracy, there is a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. In order to improve sensitivity while preserving specificity, we propose a cascade deep learning model constructed using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and dual fully convolutional networks (FCNs). The cascade CNN model is built for identifying bleeding; hereafter the dual FCN is to detect five different subtypes of intracranial hemorrhage and to delineate their lesions. Using a total of 135,974 CT images including 33,391 images labeled as bleeding, each of CNN/FCN models was trained separately on image data preprocessed by two different settings of window level/width. One is a default window (50/100[level/width]) and the other is a stroke window setting (40/40). By combining them, we obtained a better outcome on both binary classification and segmentation of hemorrhagic lesions compared to a single CNN and FCN model. In determining whether it is bleeding or not, there was around 1% improvement in sensitivity (97.91% [+/- 0.47]) while retaining specificity (98.76% [+/- 0.10]). For delineation of bleeding lesions, we obtained overall segmentation performance at 80.19% in precision and 82.15% in recall which is 3.44% improvement compared to using a single FCN model.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE