Detailed Information

Cited 3 time in webofscience Cited 6 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in sonographic size measurements of gallbladder polyps

Authors
Lee, Seul BiLee, YedaunKim, Seung JinYoon, Jung HeeKim, Seung HoKim, Suk JungJung, Hyun KyungHahn, SeokBaek, Hye Jin
Issue Date
Jan-2020
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Gallbladder; Observer variation; Polyps; Reproducibility of results; Ultrasonography
Citation
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, v.30, no.1, pp.206 - 212
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume
30
Number
1
Start Page
206
End Page
212
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gnu/handle/sw.gnu/7100
DOI
10.1007/s00330-019-06385-4
ISSN
0938-7994
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of gallbladder polyp measurements using transabdominal US and the factors that affect reliability. Methods From November 2017 to February 2018, two radiologists measured the maximum diameter of 91 gallbladder polyps using transabdominal US. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were determined using 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The effects of image settings, polyp location, and polyp size were evaluated by comparing ICCs using z tests. Results The intraobserver agreement rates were 0.960 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.939-0.973) for observer 1 and 0.962 (95% CI, 0.943-0.975) for observer 2. The ICCs between the two observers were 0.963 (95% CI, 0.926-0.979) for the first measurement and 0.973 (95% CI, 0.950-0.984) for the second measurement. The 95% limits of agreement on repeated measurements were 22.3-25.2% of the mean, and those between the two observers were 25.5-34.2% of the mean. ICCs for large polyps (>= 5 mm) were significantly higher than those for small polyps (< 5 mm). There were no significant differences in the ICCs between image settings and polyp location. Conclusions Polyp size measurements using transabdominal US are highly repeatable and reproducible. Polyp size significantly affects the reliability of measurement. Diameter changes of approximately less than 25% may fall within the measurement error; this should be considered while interpreting the change in size during follow-up US, especially for small polyps.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Baek, Hye Jin photo

Baek, Hye Jin
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE