Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Cephalomedullary Nailing with an Additional Cannulated Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femur FracturesCephalomedullary Nailing with an Additional Cannulated Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femur Fractures

Other Titles
Cephalomedullary Nailing with an Additional Cannulated Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femur Fractures
Authors
김경환남우동허연식정구희
Issue Date
Jan-2024
Publisher
대한골절학회
Keywords
대퇴 경부 기저부 골절; 고관절 골절; 대퇴골; 골수정; 추가 유관 나사못; Basicervical fracture; Hip fracture; Femur; Cephalomedullary nailing; Additional cannulated screw Copyright
Citation
대한골절학회지, v.37, no.1, pp 22 - 29
Pages
8
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
대한골절학회지
Volume
37
Number
1
Start Page
22
End Page
29
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/69663
DOI
10.12671/jkfs.2024.37.1.22
ISSN
1225-1682
2287-9293
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the clinical results of patients with basicervical fracture undergoing cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) with an additional cannulated screw fixation compared to only performing CMN. We hypothesized that a difference may exist in the clinical outcomes if an additional screw is fixed with CMN compared to only performing CMN in basicervical fracture. Materials and Methods: A total of 28 consecutive patients who underwent CMN for basicervical fracture were included. In 9 cases, only CMN was conducted, and in 19 cases, an additional cannulated screw fixation was performed with CMN. Bone union, sliding distance, reduction status, and fixation failure were evaluated by postoperative radiography, and ambulatory ability was evaluated by functional results. These findings were compared between a group of CMN and a group of CMN with an additional cannulated screw. Results: There were 4 males and 24 females with a mean age of 84 years (range, 69–100 years). No significant difference was found in postoperative reduction, tip-apex distance, bone union, and walking function recovery after surgery between the two groups, but in the sliding distance of the lag screw, the CMN group demonstrated more sliding (6.2 mm [range, 2.5–13.4 mm] vs 3.5 mm [range, 0.1– 9.2 mm]; p=0.045). Among the two groups, only one case of fixation failure at the postoperative four months was observed in the CMN group (p=0.321), and hemiarthroplasty with nail construct removal was performed. Conclusion: CMN with additional cannulated screw fixation is a safe and reliable surgical option in basicervical fracture. It provided favorable clinical outcomes and may be a good alternative for treating basicervical fracture.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE