Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Angiographic Severity of the Nonculprit Lesion and the Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization in Patients With AMI: FRAME-AMI Substudyopen access

Authors
Seung, JaehoChoo, Eun HoKim, Chan JoonKim, Hyun KukPark, Keun HoLee, Seung HunKim, Min ChulHong, Young JoonAhn, Sung GyunDoh, Joon-HyungLee, Sang YeubPark, Sang DonLee, Hyun-JongKang, Min GyuKoh, Jin-SinCho, Yun-KyeongNam, Chang-WookKoo, Bon-KwonLee, Bong-KiYun, Kyeong HoHong, DavidJoh, Hyun SungChoi, Ki HongPark, Taek KyuLee, Joo MyungYang, Jeong HoonSong, Young BinChoi, Seung-HyukGwon, Hyeon-CheolHahn, Joo-Yong
Issue Date
Jan-2024
Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Keywords
coronary angiography; drug-eluting stents; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis
Citation
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.17, no.1, pp E013611
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume
17
Number
1
Start Page
E013611
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/69487
DOI
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013611
ISSN
1941-7640
1941-7632
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The benefit of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for noninfarct-related artery (IRA) lesions with angiographically severe stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction is unclear. METHODS: Among 562 patients from the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infraction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) who were randomly allocated into either FFR-guided or angiography-guided PCI for non-IRA lesions, the current study evaluated the relationship between non-IRA stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the efficacy of FFR-guided PCI. The incidence of the primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) was compared between FFR- and angiography-guided PCI according to non-IRA stenosis severity (QCA stenosis ≥70% or <70%). RESULTS: A total of 562 patients were assigned to FFR-guided (n=284) versus angiography-guided PCI (n=278). At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the primary end point occurred in 14 of 181 patients with FFR-guided PCI and 31 of 197 patients with angiography-guided PCI among patients with QCA stenosis ≥70% (8.5% versus 19.2%; hazard ratio, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.22-0.80]; P=0.008), while occurred in 4 of 103 patients with FFR-guided PCI and 9 of 81 patients with angiography-guided PCI among those with QCA stenosis <70% (3.9% versus 11.1%; P=0.315). There was no significant interaction between treatment strategy and non-IRA stenosis severity (P for interaction=0.636). FFR-guided PCI was associated with the reduction of death and myocardial infarction in both patients with QCA stenosis ≥70% (6.7% versus 15.1%; P=0.008) and those with QCA stenosis <70% (1.0% versus 9.6%; P=0.042) compared with angiography-guided PCI. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, FFR-guided PCI tended to have a lower risk of primary end point than angiography-guided PCI regardless of non-IRA stenosis severity without significant interaction. © 2023 American Heart Association, Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE