Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Benefit of Intravascular Imaging Compared with Conventional Angiography in Left Main Coronary Artery Intervention

Authors
Kwon, WoochanLee, Joo MyungYun, Kyeong HoChoi, Ki HongLee, Seung-JaeLee, Jong-YoungLee, Sang YeubKim, Sang MinCho, Jae YoungKim, Chan JoonAhn, Hyo-SukNam, Chang-WookYoon, Hyuck-JunPark, Yong HwanLee, Wang SooJeong, Jin-OkSong, Pil SangDoh, Joon-HyungJo, Sang-HoYoon, Chang-HwanKang, Min GyuKoh, Jin-SinLee, Kwan YongLim, Young-HyoCho, Yun-HyeongCho, Jin-ManJang, Woo JinChun, Kook-JinHong, DavidPark, Taek KyuYang, Jeong HoonChoi, Seung-HyukGwon, Hyeon-CheolHahn, Joo-YongSong, Young Bin
Issue Date
Dec-2023
Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Keywords
angiography; coronary artery; patients; percutaneous coronary intervention; prognosis
Citation
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.16, no.12, pp E013359
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume
16
Number
12
Start Page
E013359
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/69019
DOI
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013359
ISSN
1941-7640
1941-7632
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) demonstrated that intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved clinical outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI for patients with complex coronary artery lesions. This study aims to assess whether the prognostic benefit of intravascular imaging-guided procedural optimization persists in patients undergoing PCI for left main coronary artery disease. METHODS: Of 1639 patients enrolled in the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI, 192 patients with left main coronary artery disease were selected for the current prespecified substudy. Selected patients were randomly assigned to either the intravascular imaging-guided PCI group (n=138) or the angiography-guided PCI group (n=54). The primary end point was target vessel failure defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range 1.1 to 3.0 years), intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with lower incidence of primary end point compared with angiography-guided PCI (6.8% versus 25.1%; hazard ratio, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.76]; P=0.010). This significant reduction in primary end point was mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death or spontaneous target vessel-related myocardial infarction (1.6% versus 12.7%; hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.03-0.82]; P=0.028). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was independently associated with a lower risk of primary end point, even after adjusting for various clinical factors (hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.12-0.72]; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed clinical benefit over angiography-guided PCI for left main coronary artery disease in reducing the risk of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872. © 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE