Quantitative Network Comparisons of REM Sleep Without Atonia Across the α-Synucleinopathy Spectrum: A Systematic Reviewopen access
- Authors
- Byun, Jung-Ick; Yang, Tae-Won; Sunwoo, Jun-Sang; Shin, Won Chul; Kwon, Oh-Young; Jung, Ki-Young
- Issue Date
- Aug-2023
- Publisher
- Dove Medical Press Ltd
- Keywords
- network meta-analysis; REM sleep behavior disorder; REM sleep without atonia; α-synucleinopathy
- Citation
- Nature and Science of Sleep, v.15, pp 691 - 703
- Pages
- 13
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Nature and Science of Sleep
- Volume
- 15
- Start Page
- 691
- End Page
- 703
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/68010
- DOI
- 10.2147/NSS.S423878
- ISSN
- 1179-1608
- Abstract
- Purpose: Isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is characterized by REM sleep without atonia (RWA) and is regarded as the prodromal stage of α-synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). RWA is also associated with neurodegeneration driven by α-synucleinopathy. However, the level of RWA across the α-synucleinopathy spectrum remains elusive. We aimed to rate the percentage of RWA across the α-synucleinopathy spectrum, encompassing prodromal and overt phenotypes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We included cohort, cross-sectional, and case–control studies comparing the RWA percentage during REM sleep evaluated by tonic chin activity (RWA%-T) or by phasic chin activity (RWA%-P) across the α-synucleinopathy spectrum. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine both direct and indirect evidence regarding the group differences in the RWA%-T and RWA%-P. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to estimate the ranked probability. Results: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The investigations included 204 iRBD, 295 PD with RBD (PDwtRBD), 187 PD without RBD (PDwoRBD), 42 MSAwtRBD, 9 DLBwtRBD patients, and 246 controls. MSAwtRBD ranked first in RWA%-T, whereas iRBD ranked first in RWA%-P. RWA% in PDwoRBD patients was comparable to that in the controls and was lower than that in PDwtRBD patients. Conclusion: Overt phenotypes such as MSAwtRBD and PDwtRBD ranked high in RWA%-T, whereas iRBD, a prodromal type, ranked highest in RWA%-P. Taken together, our data suggest that the percentage of neurodegeneration in RBD patients may be associated with RWA%-T rather than RWA%-P. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42021276445. © 2023 Byun et al.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.