Detailed Information

Cited 41 time in webofscience Cited 44 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Authors
Shin, Eun-SeokJun, Eun JungKim, SunwonKim, BitnaKim, Tae-HyunSohn, Chang-BaeHer, Ae-YoungPark, YongwhiCho, Jung RaeJeong, Young-HoonChoi, Byung Joo
Issue Date
Feb-2023
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Keywords
& nbsp; coronary artery disease; drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent(s); multivessel; paclitaxel-coated balloon; percutaneous coronary intervention
Citation
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.16, no.3, pp 292 - 299
Pages
8
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume
16
Number
3
Start Page
292
End Page
299
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/59760
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.049
ISSN
1936-8798
1876-7605
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in the context of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are limited. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of DCB-based treatment on percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel CAD. METHODS A total of 254 patients with multivessel disease successfully treated with DCBs or in combination with drug-eluting stents (DES) were retrospectively enrolled (DCB-based group) and compared with 254 propensity-matched pa-tients treated with second-generation DES from the PTRG-DES (Platelet Function and Genotype-Related Long-Term Prognosis in Drug-Eluting Stent-Treated Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) registry (n =13,160) (DES-only group). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding at 2 years. RESULTS Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. In the DCB-based group, 34.3% of patients were treated with DCBs only and 65.7% were treated with the DES hybrid approach. The number of stents and total stent length were significantly reduced by 65.4% and 63.7%, respectively, in the DCB-based group compared with the DES-only group. Moreover, the DCB-based group had a lower rate of MACE than the DES-only group (3.9% and 11.0%; P = 0.002) at 2-year follow-up. The DES-only group had a higher risk for cardiac death and major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS The DCB-based treatment approach showed a significantly reduced stent burden for multivessel percuta-neous coronary intervention and led to a lower rate of MACE than the DES-only treatment. This study shows that DCB-based treatment approach safely reduces stent burden in multivessel CAD, and improved long-term outcomes may be expected by reducing stent-related events. (Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in De Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277) (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2023;16:292-299) & COPY; 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE