Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical impact of early reinsertion of a central venous catheter after catheter removal in patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections

Authors
Lee, Yu-MiRyu, Byung-HanHong, Sun InCho, Oh-HyunHong, Kyung-WookBae, In-GyuKwack, Won GunKim, Young JinChung, Eun KyoungKim, Dong YounLee, Mi SukPark, Ki-Ho
Issue Date
Feb-2021
Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Citation
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, v.42, no.2, pp.162 - 168
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume
42
Number
2
Start Page
162
End Page
168
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gnu/handle/sw.gnu/4188
DOI
10.1017/ice.2020.405
ISSN
0899-823X
Abstract
Objective: Early replacement of a new central venous catheter (CVC) may pose a risk of persistent or recurrent infection in patients with a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). We evaluated the clinical impact of early CVC reinsertion after catheter removal in patients with CRBSIs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with confirmed CRBSIs in 2 tertiary-care hospitals over a 7-year period. Results: To treat their infections, 316 patients with CRBSIs underwent CVC removal. Among them, 130 (41.1%) underwent early CVC reinsertion (<= 3 days after CVC removal), 39 (12.4%) underwent delayed reinsertion (>3 days), and 147 (46.5%) did not undergo CVC reinsertion. There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the 3 groups, except for nontunneled CVC, presence of septic shock, and reason for CVC reinsertion. The rate of persistent CRBSI in the early CVC reinsertion group (22.3%) was higher than that in the no CVC reinsertion group (7.5%; P = .002) but was similar to that in the delayed CVC reinsertion group (17.9%; P > .99). The other clinical outcomes did not differ among the 3 groups, including rates of 30-day mortality, complicated infection, and recurrence. After controlling for several confounding factors, early CVC reinsertion was not significantly associated with persistent CRBSI (OR, 1.59; P = .35) or 30-day mortality compared with delayed CVC reinsertion (OR, 0.81; P = .68). Conclusions: Early CVC reinsertion in the setting of CRBSI may be safe. Replacement of a new CVC should not be delayed in patients who still require a CVC for ongoing management.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Cho, Oh Hyun photo

Cho, Oh Hyun
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE