Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Nephrologists' Perspectives on Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment and Palliative Care at End of Life: A Questionnaire Survey in Korea

Authors
Hong, Yu AhChung, SungjinPark, Woo YeongBae, Eun JinYang, Jae WonShin, Dong HoKim, Sang WookShin, Sung Joon
Issue Date
1-Apr-2021
Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
Keywords
dialysis; end of life; palliative care; withdrawal; withhold
Citation
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, v.24, no.4, pp 527 - 535
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume
24
Number
4
Start Page
527
End Page
535
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/3859
DOI
10.1089/jpm.2020.0248
ISSN
1096-6218
1557-7740
Abstract
Background:Nephrologists commonly engage in decision making regarding the withholding or withdrawal of dialysis and palliative care in patients at end of life (EoL). However, these issues remain an unsolved dilemma for nephrologists. Objective:To explore nephrologists' perceptions on the decision-making process about withholding or withdrawing dialysis and palliative care in Korea. Design:A nationwide 25-item questionnaire online survey via e-mail. Setting/Subjects:A total of 369 Korean nephrologists completed the survey. Results:The proportions of respondents who stated that withholding or withdrawing dialysis at EoL is ethically appropriate were 87.3% and 86.2%, respectively. A total of 72.4% respondents thought that withdrawal of dialysis in a maintenance dialysis patient is ethically appropriate. Responses regarding patient features that should be considered to withhold or withdraw dialysis were as follows: dialysis intolerance (84.3%), poor performance status (74.8%), patient's active request (47.2%), age (28.7%), very severe dementia (27.1%), and several comorbidities (16.5%). Among those nephrologists who responded to the question about the minimum age, at which dialysis should be withheld or withdrawn, most specified an age between 80 and 90 years (94.3%). Fifty-eight percent of respondents stated that terminally ill dialysis patients should be allowed to use palliative care facilities. In addition, a number of nephrologists thought that adequate palliative care facilities, specific treatment guidelines, enough time to manage patients, financial support, and adequate medical experts are necessary. Conclusions:Korean nephrologists thought that withholding or withdrawing dialysis at EoL is ethically appropriate, even in maintenance dialysis patients. Therefore, consensus guidelines for palliative care after withholding or withdrawal of dialysis are needed.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE