The effect of initial intravitreal tissue plasminogen activator and gas injection on vision improvement in patients with submacular haemorrhage associated with age-related macular degenerationopen access
- Authors
- Lee, Seung Ha; Lee, Sang Joon; Shin, Yong Il; Lim, Hyung Bin; Kim, Jung Yeul; Han, Yong Seop; Nam, Ki Yup
- Issue Date
- Nov-2021
- Publisher
- Nature Publishing Group
- Citation
- Eye, v.35, no.11, pp 3064 - 3070
- Pages
- 7
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Eye
- Volume
- 35
- Number
- 11
- Start Page
- 3064
- End Page
- 3070
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/3024
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41433-020-01383-z
- ISSN
- 0950-222X
1476-5454
- Abstract
- Purpose To compare visual improvements between initial intravitreal t-PA with gas injection before anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and anti-VEGF injection monotherapy for submacular haemorrhage (SMH) associated with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of naive patients treated with intravitreal t-PA with gas injection before anti-VEGF (Group 1) or only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (Group 2) for SMH [disc area (DA) >= 2] associated with AMD from two institutions. Both groups received 3 monthly loads of anti-VEGF injections followed by injections as needed for AMD treatment. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) between the initial visit and after 6 months of treatment were compared between two groups. Results A total of 82 patients were enroled. Of these, 32 patients and 50 patients were grouped in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean change in BCVA over 6 months for Group 1 was -0.52 +/- 0.88, which was significantly larger (p = 0.044) than the mean change for Group 2 (-0.15 +/- 0.58). We compared visual improvements between the two groups based on the following SMH size categories: <= 5, >5, and <= 15, and >15 DA. When the SMH size was <= 5, or >5 and <= 15 DA, the mean change in BCVA was larger for Group 1 than for Group 2, but this difference was not significant. When SMH size was >15 DA, Group 1 patients exhibited a mean visual improvement of -0.79 +/- 0.80, which was significantly greater (p = 0.029) than that of Group 2 (-0.06 +/- 0.67). Conclusions Patients that were primarily treated for SMH associated with AMD using t-PA and gas injection (followed by anti-VEGF injection) exhibited better visual improvement than those treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy, especially in patients exhibiting larger SMH sizes (>15 DA) at the initial visit.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.