Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

주식양도담보의 효력Legal Effect of Mortgage in the form of written Assignment of Shares

Other Titles
Legal Effect of Mortgage in the form of written Assignment of Shares
Authors
권기훈
Issue Date
2008
Publisher
한양법학회
Keywords
mortgage of shares; mortgage in the form of written assignment; mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares; approval from the board of directors; non-issue of shares; 주식담보; 양도담보; 주식양도담보; 이사회의 승인; 주권불발행
Citation
한양법학, no.22, pp 115 - 134
Pages
20
Indexed
KCICANDI
Journal Title
한양법학
Number
22
Start Page
115
End Page
134
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/28056
ISSN
1226-8062
Abstract
Mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares may be considered assignment of shares, which emphasizes the formality, and it may be considered security of shares, which emphasizes the substance of the contract. These different perspectives lead to differences in the legal force of mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares. Fundamentally, it is the issue of whether to regard mortgage in the form of written assignment as trust ownership or real rights granted by way of security. Provisional Registration Security Act regards mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares as real rights granted by way of security and the recent case on mortgage in the form of written assignment in general also shows the change of stance from the conventional “transfer of trust ownership” theory to “real rights granted by way of security” theory. Stock transfer is the stockholder's way of public offering and has the opposing power against and the qualification-granting effect on the company of the transferee, causing a de facto change in ownership. Therefore, it is possible to apply the law in the case of mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares. In this regard, mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares, as a kind of real rights granted by way of security, has a characteristic of real rights granted by way of security, which means that the foreclosure is prohibited and the ownership of the shares cannot be acquired without certain clearing process by the creditor, even with the title transfer. This interpretation of the law better serves the intention of the contracting parties and the purpose of the law which is to protect the interest of the transferee. Since the creditor does not obtain the ownership of the shares, he or she obtains real rights granted by way of security. Therefore, the creditor has a right to distribution of profit but does not have a voting right. Also, the creditor does not have get an approval of the board of directors when signing a mortgage in the form of written assignment contract on the shares of a company that has a provision in the statute that says “the approval of the board of directors is required for a transfer of shares.” This is because mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares contract is interpreted as establishment of the security right, not a transfer of shares. However, the creditor must get an approval from the board of directors when disposing of his or her shares for exercising of right, as in the right of pledge of shares.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
법과대학 > Department of Law > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE