주식양도담보의 효력Legal Effect of Mortgage in the form of written Assignment of Shares
- Other Titles
- Legal Effect of Mortgage in the form of written Assignment of Shares
- Authors
- 권기훈
- Issue Date
- 2008
- Publisher
- 한양법학회
- Keywords
- mortgage of shares; mortgage in the form of written assignment; mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares; approval from the board of directors; non-issue of shares; 주식담보; 양도담보; 주식양도담보; 이사회의 승인; 주권불발행
- Citation
- 한양법학, no.22, pp 115 - 134
- Pages
- 20
- Indexed
- KCICANDI
- Journal Title
- 한양법학
- Number
- 22
- Start Page
- 115
- End Page
- 134
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/28056
- ISSN
- 1226-8062
- Abstract
- Mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares may be considered assignment of shares,
which emphasizes the formality, and it may be considered security of shares, which emphasizes the
substance of the contract. These different perspectives lead to differences in the legal force of
mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares. Fundamentally, it is the issue of whether to
regard mortgage in the form of written assignment as trust ownership or real rights granted by
way of security. Provisional Registration Security Act regards mortgage in the form of written
assignment of shares as real rights granted by way of security and the recent case on mortgage in
the form of written assignment in general also shows the change of stance from the conventional
“transfer of trust ownership” theory to “real rights granted by way of security” theory. Stock
transfer is the stockholder's way of public offering and has the opposing power against and the
qualification-granting effect on the company of the transferee, causing a de facto change in
ownership. Therefore, it is possible to apply the law in the case of mortgage in the form of
written assignment of shares. In this regard, mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares,
as a kind of real rights granted by way of security, has a characteristic of real rights granted by
way of security, which means that the foreclosure is prohibited and the ownership of the shares
cannot be acquired without certain clearing process by the creditor, even with the title transfer.
This interpretation of the law better serves the intention of the contracting parties and the purpose
of the law which is to protect the interest of the transferee. Since the creditor does not obtain the
ownership of the shares, he or she obtains real rights granted by way of security. Therefore, the
creditor has a right to distribution of profit but does not have a voting right. Also, the creditor
does not have get an approval of the board of directors when signing a mortgage in the form of
written assignment contract on the shares of a company that has a provision in the statute that
says “the approval of the board of directors is required for a transfer of shares.” This is because
mortgage in the form of written assignment of shares contract is interpreted as establishment of the
security right, not a transfer of shares. However, the creditor must get an approval from the board
of directors when disposing of his or her shares for exercising of right, as in the right of pledge
of shares.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 법과대학 > Department of Law > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.