급성전골수구성백혈병에서 PML/RARα 유전자 이형의 임상적 의의Clinical significance of PML/RARα isoforms in acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Other Titles
- Clinical significance of PML/RARα isoforms in acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Authors
- 이원식; 이상민; 이규형; 이제환; 최성준; 이정희; 김대영; 임성남; 박재후; 민영주; 김혁; 배성화; 류헌모; 현명수; 김민경; 장대영; 김효정; 정철원; 안진석; 이경원; 이정림; 주영돈
- Issue Date
- 2008
- Publisher
- 대한내과학회
- Keywords
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia; PML-RARα; Isoform; Acute promyelocytic leukemia; PML-RARα; Isoform; 급성전골수구성백혈병; PML-RARα; 이형
- Citation
- 대한내과학회지, v.75, no.4, pp 412 - 419
- Pages
- 8
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 대한내과학회지
- Volume
- 75
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 412
- End Page
- 419
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/27787
- ISSN
- 1738-9364
2289-0769
- Abstract
- Background/Aims: There are three types of PML-RARα mRNA fusion transcripts associated with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): the short (S)-form, the long (L)-form and the variable (V)-form. No study on the Korean population has addressed the clinical significance of the specific types of PML-RARα mRNA fusion transcripts for APL patients who receive the combination therapy of all-trans-retinoic-acid and idarubicin (AIDA regimen).
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on 94 patients with APL to evaluate differences in the therapeutic outcomes, such as the response rate, an event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS), after remission following the induction of chemotherapy. We also analyzed whether differences in the pretreatment clinical characteristics depend on the PML-RARα isoform.
Results: The median age of the patients was 41 years (range 15-85). Among the 94 patients, there were 58 L-form cases (62.1%), 32 S-form cases (34.0%), and 4 V-form cases (4.3%). The CR rate following remission induction treatment was 84.9%. The CR rate was higher in patients with an initial WBC <10.0×109/L, as compared to patients with an initial WBC higher than 10.0×109/L (93.5% vs. 65.4%, p=0.001). The AIDA induction regimen was associated with a better EFS than non-AIDA induction regimens (81.9% vs. 49.6%, p=0.006). The induction group was also a significant prognostic factor for EFS in the multivariate analysis (p=0.020). There were no differences in OS and EFS in patients with either isoform L or isoform S in the AIDA induction group.
Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated that pretreatment clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were not significantly different among patients with varying PML-RARα isoform types in the AIDA induction group. (Korean J Med 75:412-419, 2008)
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.