Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

제2종지구단위계획과 계획단위개발(PUD)의 계획지침 비교 연구A Comparative Study on the Planning Guidelines between District Unit Plan Type II and Planned Unit Development(PUD)

Other Titles
A Comparative Study on the Planning Guidelines between District Unit Plan Type II and Planned Unit Development(PUD)
Authors
안정근정오락
Issue Date
2008
Publisher
대한국토·도시계획학회
Keywords
Second District Unit Plan; Planned Unit Development; Residential Site Development; Non Urbanize Area; Second District Unit Plan; Planned Unit Development; Residential Site Development; Non Urbanize Area; 제2종지구단위계획; 계획단위개발; 주택단지 개발; 비시가화지역
Citation
국토계획, v.43, no.7, pp 43 - 56
Pages
14
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
국토계획
Volume
43
Number
7
Start Page
43
End Page
56
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/27665
ISSN
1226-7147
2383-9171
Abstract
The District Unit Plan Type II applies to environmentally sensitive areas such as Green Zone, Management Zone, Agricultural Zone, and Natural Environment Reserve Zone which are required very carefully to the development of residential, industrial, commercial sites. However, it is possible to develop several types of development without plans or considering environment aspects so that they are required to develop several types of sites satisfying the demand of residents and the harmony with natural environment. PUD can provide sound residential environment by suggesting proper planning guidelines such as development density, green space ratio as well as the coordination with government officers, developers, residents, and experts. The purpose of this study is to suggest several prosperous directions compare to the planning guidelines between the district unit plan type II and planned unit development systems. This study reaches to following conclusions; First, it is necessary to open citizen participation by flexibility of planing process and reflect urban planning committee, and separate the district unit plan type II procedure as a preliminary plan and an actual plan. Second, it is necessary to establish flexible planning guidelines for accommodating the demand of residents and local aspects. Third, mixed land use and cluster development should be applied to new development by revising current planning guidelines. Fourth, it is necessary to provide open space more clearly and distinguish open space by recreational open space and natural open space. Fifth, it is necessary to apply diverse density incentives for encouraging the development of public facilities and open spaces. Sixth, it is necessary to suggest clear criterion on spatial plan for the better quality of life and environment.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
공과대학 > 도시공학과 > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE