Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fracturesopen access

Authors
Lee, K.S.Do, G.C.Shin, J.B.Kim, M.H.Kim, J.S.Kim, N.G.
Issue Date
Aug-2022
Publisher
Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
Keywords
Data interpretation; statistical/ Facial bones/ Imaging; three-dimensional/ Zygoma/ Zygoma fracture
Citation
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery, v.23, no.4, pp 171 - 177
Pages
7
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume
23
Number
4
Start Page
171
End Page
177
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/2707
DOI
10.7181/acfs.2022.00164
ISSN
2287-1152
2287-5603
Abstract
Background: The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures. Methods: In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points?the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height?using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods. Results: All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p< 0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance. Conclusion: Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation. ? 2022 Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의학계열 > 의학과 > Journal Articles
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jun Sik photo

Kim, Jun Sik
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE