Detailed Information

Cited 53 time in webofscience Cited 60 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Response to an Outpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Patients With Advanced Cancer and Cancer Painopen access

Authors
Yennurajalingam, SriramKang, Jung HunHui, DavidKang, Duck-HeeKim, Sun HyunBruera, Eduardo
Issue Date
Sep-2012
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
Palliative care; cancer pain; response rate; interdisciplinary care; pain management
Citation
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, v.44, no.3, pp 340 - 350
Pages
11
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume
44
Number
3
Start Page
340
End Page
350
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/22032
DOI
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.014
ISSN
0885-3924
1873-6513
Abstract
Context. There is limited published data regarding the outcomes of palliative care consult on cancer pain treatment at the first follow-up visit. Objectives. The primary aim of this study was to determine pain treatment response to an outpatient palliative care consultation at the first follow-up visit for patients with cancer pain. Methods. Data from consecutive patients (n = 1612) who were referred to the outpatient Supportive Care Center at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System at their initial and subsequent visits from January 2003 to December 2010 were reviewed. All patients received interdisciplinary care led by palliative care specialists following an institutional protocol. Pain treatment response was defined as a >= 2 point or >= 30% reduction from baseline. Using logistic regression models, predictive factors associated with pain treatment response were assessed. Results. The mean (SD) baseline pain was 5.36 (2.9). Of the 1612 patients, 462 (29%) rated their pain as mild (numeric rating scale [NRS] score 0-3), 511 (32%) as moderate (NRS score 4-6), and 639 (39%) as severe (NRS score 7-10). Almost half (728 of 1612 [45%]) of the patients achieved pain treatment response. However, 228 of 728 (31%) responding patients still had pain >= 4 at the first follow-up visit in 15 days on average. Of the 462 patients with mild pain at baseline, 147 (32%) had worse pain at the first follow-up visit. Factors associated with clinical response were baseline pain intensity (odds ratio [OR] per point 1.4; P < 0.01), fatigue (OR per point 1.01; P = 0.014), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System symptom burden (OR per point 1.01; P = 0.039). Conclusion. More than half of the patients with moderate/severe pain were nonresponders, and about one-third of the patients with mild pain had an increase in pain severity to moderate/severe levels at the first follow-up. More frequent follow-up visits, phone calls, and interdisciplinary clinics may improve pain control. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012;44:340e350. (C) 2012 U. S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kang, Jung Hun photo

Kang, Jung Hun
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE