Detailed Information
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in 
Cited 0 time in
Metadata Downloads
Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clausesopen accessMultiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses
- Other Titles
- Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses
- Issue Date
- 2014
- Publisher
- 한국생성문법학회
- Keywords
- multiple fragment answers; ellipsis; Right Dislocation; pro; cleft; clause-mate condition; multiple sluicing
- Citation
- 생성문법연구, v.24, no.1, pp 307 - 323
- Pages
- 17
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 생성문법연구
- Volume
- 24
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 307
- End Page
- 323
- ISSN
- 1225-6048
2713-5454
- Abstract
- In this squib, we review two recent analyses of multiple fragmentanswers (MFA) in Korean. Ahn and Cho (2013) argue that MFAs arederived from multiple clauses, each fragment being derived from its own(sentential) source. On the other hand, Ahn (2012) suggests an extensionof Lasnik's (2007, 2013) analysis of English multiple sluicing to KoreanMFAs. Discussing their arguments in detail, we argue that these analysescannot be maintained. We show that Korean MFAs are best captured ifwe assume that MFAs are derived from a mono-clause via either ellipsisor pro/cleft, as argued by Park (2013).
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 인문대학 > 영어영문학부 > Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.