Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Diagnostic Value of Ascitic Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer-associated Malignant Ascitesopen accessDiagnostic Value of Ascitic Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer-associated Malignant Ascites

Other Titles
Diagnostic Value of Ascitic Tumor Markers for Gastric Cancer-associated Malignant Ascites
Authors
Yang YaewonKim Hong JunGo Se-ilBae Woo KyunSong Eun-KeeByeon SeonggyuKim Hee KyungJeong YusookKwon JihyunLee Ki HyeongChae Hee BokSon Seung-MyoungKim Dae HoonYun Hyo YungHan Hye Sook
Issue Date
2022
Publisher
대한상부위장관ㆍ헬리코박터학회
Keywords
Ascites; Biomakers; tumor; Diagnosis; Stomach neoplasms
Citation
Korean Journal of Helicobacter Upper Gastrointestinal Research, v.22, no.1, pp.38 - 49
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Helicobacter Upper Gastrointestinal Research
Volume
22
Number
1
Start Page
38
End Page
49
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gnu/handle/sw.gnu/1859
DOI
10.7704/kjhugr.2021.0058
ISSN
1738-3331
Abstract
Background/Aims: Peritoneal carcinomatosis with malignant ascites is common in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). The detection of tumor cells is the gold standard for the diagnosis of malignant ascites; however, it often requires complementary tests because of its low sensitivity. Herein, we measured the levels of tumor markers in the malignant ascites of GC patients (GC-ascites) and benign ascites of liver cirrhosis patients (LC-ascites) to elucidate the diagnostic value of tumor markers in GC-ascites. Materials and Methods: The levels of CEA, cancer antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4), CA 19-9, and CA 125 were measured in 138 GC-ascites and 64 LC-ascites samples obtained from the National Biobank of Korea. We performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the optimal cutoff value for each tumor marker. Results: CEA, CA 72-4, and CA 19-9 levels were significantly higher in GC-ascites than in LC-ascites. There was no difference in tumor marker levels between GC-ascites samples irrespective of cytology. CEA, CA 72-4, and CA 19-9 had sensitivities of 85.5%, 79.0%, and 61.6%, respectively, and specificities of 96.8%, 100.0%, and 89.1%, respectively, for distinguishing GC-ascites samples from LC-ascites samples. The diagnostic accuracy was improved by combining two or more tumor markers. The combination of CEA and CA 72-4 showed the highest sensitivity (86.2%) and specificity (100%). Conclusions: Measurement of tumor markers, such as CEA, CA 72-4, and CA 19-9, in ascites samples could help diagnose GC-ascites, and combining two or more tumor markers could further increase the diagnostic yield, even in cytology-negative patients.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Go, Se Il photo

Go, Se Il
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE