Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 40 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Establishing the heparin therapeutic range using aPTT and anti-Xa measurements for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapyopen access

Authors
Byun, J.-H.Jang, I.-S.Kim, J.W.Koh, E.-H.
Issue Date
2016
Publisher
Korean Society of Hematology
Keywords
Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT); Chromogenic anti-Xa test assay; Heparin therapeutic range (HTR); Unfractionated heparin (UFH)
Citation
Blood Research, v.51, no.3, pp 171 - 174
Pages
4
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Blood Research
Volume
51
Number
3
Start Page
171
End Page
174
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/16667
DOI
10.5045/br.2016.51.3.171
ISSN
2287-979X
2288-0011
Abstract
Background Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has unstable pharmacokinetics and requires close monitoring. The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) test has been used to monitor UFH therapy for decades in Korea, but its results can be affected by numerous variables. We established an aPTT heparin therapeutic range (HTR) corresponding to therapeutic anti-Xa levels for continuous intravenous UFH administration, and used appropriate monitoring to determine if an adequate dose of UFH was applied. Methods A total of 134 ex vivo samples were obtained from 71 patients with a variety of thromboembolisms. All patients received intravenous UFH therapy and were enrolled from June to September 2015 at Gyeongsang National University Hospital. All laboratory protocols were in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and the College of American Pathologist requirements for aPTT HTR. Results An aPTT range of 87.1 sec to 128.7 sec corresponded to anti-Xa levels of 0.3 IU/mL to 0.7 IU/mL for HTR under our laboratory conditions. Based on their anti-Xa levels, blood specimen distribution were as follows: less than 0.3 IU/mL, 65.7%; 0.3-0.7 IU/mL (therapeutic range), 33.6%; and more than 0.7 IU/mL, 0.7%. No evidence of recurring thromboembolism was observed. Conclusion Using the conventional aPTT target range may lead to inappropriate dosing of UFH. Transitioning from the aPTT test to the anti-Xa assay is required to avoid the laborious validation of the aPTT HTR test, even though the anti-Xa assay is more expensive. ? 2016 Korean Society of Hematology.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Koh, Eun Ha photo

Koh, Eun Ha
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE