Cited 0 time in
중학교 과학 교과서의‘유전과 진화’단원에 대한 논증 구조 분석
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김동희 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 김용진 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T20:33:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T20:33:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2234-876X | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2765-5873 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/15975 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study is to analyze the types and the levels of argument structure of ‘Heredity and Evolution’ unit in the middle school science textbooks complied with 2009 revised science curriculum in South Korea. The applied framework of argument structure is Toulmin’s argument model. According to the type analysis of the argument structure, there were 13 kinds of types in 9 textbooks and each textbook had argument structure from 5 to 9 types. Among the analysis of 99, the above well-organized CDW type (level 3) which consists of conclusion (C), ground data (D), warrant (W) was 66 (68%). In all analysis, it was found that the examples for data (ED) were not used, but the examples about conclusion (EC) were only used. In addition, the types of textbooks were different but the similar types of argument structure were used under the same achievement standard. The level of the argument structure was classified according to the learning category. In the ‘genetic’ category, the level was above 3. In the ‘evolution’ category, the level was 2 and 4. In the ‘classification’ category, the level was 2 which didn’t have the basic argument structure. This study allows teachers to identify which argument elements are needed to be added and to assess the appropriateness of achievement standard. In addition, it suggests that the contents of the textbooks should have a structure of argumentation level 3 or higher so that students can become more logically self-directed learning. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 11 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국생물교육학회 | - |
| dc.title | 중학교 과학 교과서의‘유전과 진화’단원에 대한 논증 구조 분석 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | The Analyses of Argument Structures of‘Heredity and Evolution’Unit in Middle School Science Textbooks | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.4.701 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 생물교육, v.44, no.4, pp 701 - 711 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 생물교육 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 44 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 701 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 711 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002187155 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | argument structure | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | argument level | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | science textbook | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | heredity and evolution | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | achievement standard | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
