Interleukin-4 enzyme-linked immunospot assay may be useful for diagnosing sensitization to house dust mite
- Authors
- Chang, Dong-Yeop; Lee, Jino; Choi, Sung-Won; Lee, Hyeong Joo; Kang, Hyunmo; Yeo, Seong Chul; Joo, Yeon-Hee; Cho, Hyun-Jin; Jeon, Sea-Yuong; Kim, Rock Bum; Kim, Sang-Wook
- Issue Date
- Oct-2016
- Publisher
- WILEY-BLACKWELL
- Keywords
- allergy; allergic rhinitis; enzyme-linked immunospot assay; house dust mites; interleukin-4
- Citation
- INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, v.6, no.10, pp 1007 - 1012
- Pages
- 6
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
- Volume
- 6
- Number
- 10
- Start Page
- 1007
- End Page
- 1012
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/15231
- DOI
- 10.1002/alr.21786
- ISSN
- 2042-6976
2042-6984
- Abstract
- Background: The skin prick test (SPT) is considered a standard test for identification of allergens, but it has some limitations in clinical practice. The multiple allergen simultaneous test (MAST), which measures allergen-specific immunoglobulin E in patients' serum, is a widely used alternative test, but is limited by its relatively low sensitivity and specificity. As a novel diagnostic test to identify allergens, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of an interleukin-4 (IL-4) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay for Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p). Methods: Based on the symptoms and SPT results, 43 house dust mite (HDM) allergic rhinitis (AR) patients and 41 control subjects were included. Peripheral blood was drawn from each subject for IL-4 ELISpot assay and MAST. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the cutoff values. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and neg predictive values were compared between the 2 tests. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of the IL-4 ELISpot assay were 88.4%, 97.6%, and 0.939 for Der f, and 95.3%, 97.5%, and 0.971 for Der p, respectively. However, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of MAST were 76.7%, 73.2%, and 0.777 for Der f, and 69.8%, 75.6%, and 0.788 for Der p, respectively. Conclusion: The IL-4 ELISpot assay showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and AUC than MAST, which indicates its clinical feasibility for diagnosing allergy for HDM. A further study is needed to determine the accuracy of the IL-4 ELISpot assay for other common allergens. (C) 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.