Integrating UAV Remote Sensing with GIS for Predicting Rice Grain ProteinIntegrating UAV Remote Sensing with GIS for Predicting Rice Grain Protein
- Other Titles
- Integrating UAV Remote Sensing with GIS for Predicting Rice Grain Protein
- Authors
- Tapash Kumar Sarkar; 류찬석; 강예성; 김성헌; 전새롬; 장시형; 박준우; 김석구; 김현진
- Issue Date
- 2018
- Publisher
- 한국농업기계학회
- Keywords
- ANN; Grain protein; Spectral reflectance; UAV remote sensing
- Citation
- Journal of Biosystems Engineering, v.43, no.2, pp.148 - 159
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- Journal of Biosystems Engineering
- Volume
- 43
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 148
- End Page
- 159
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gnu/handle/sw.gnu/12733
- DOI
- 10.5307/JBE.2018.43.2.148
- ISSN
- 1738-1266
- Abstract
- Purpose: Unmanned air vehicle (UAV) remote sensing was applied to test various vegetation indices and make prediction models of protein content of rice for monitoring grain quality and proper management practice. Methods: Image acquisition was carried out by using NIR (Green, Red, NIR), RGB and RE (Blue, Green, Red-edge) camera mounted on UAV. Sampling was done synchronously at the geo-referenced points and GPS locations were recorded. Paddy samples were air-dried to 15% moisture content, and then dehulled and milled to 92% milling yield and measured the protein content by near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Artificial neural network showed the better performance with R2 (coefficient of determination) of 0.740, NSE (Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient) of 0.733 and RMSE (root mean square error) of 0.187% considering all 54 samples than the models developed by PR (polynomial regression), SLR (simple linear regression), and PLSR (partial least square regression). PLSR calibration models showed almost similar result with PR as 0.663 (R2) and 0.169% (RMSE) for cloud-free samples and 0.491 (R2) and 0.217% (RMSE) for cloud-shadowed samples. However, the validation models performed poorly. This study revealed that there is a highly significant correlation between NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) and protein content in rice. For the cloud-free samples, the SLR models showed R2 = 0.553 and RMSE = 0.210%, and for cloud-shadowed samples showed 0.479 as R2 and 0.225% as RMSE respectively. Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between spectral bands and grain protein content. Artificial neural networks have the strong advantages to fit the nonlinear problem when a sigmoid activation function is used in the hidden layer. Quantitatively, the neural network model obtained a higher precision result with a mean absolute relative error (MARE) of 2.18% and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.187%.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 농업생명과학대학 > 생물산업기계공학과 > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.