Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

그리스의 사랑 ‘페데라스티아’(παιδεραστία) -H. Patzer와 M. Foucault의 비교-

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author차영길-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T17:47:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-26T17:47:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1229-7542-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/12635-
dc.description.abstractThe main focus of this paper is on homosexuality among men, especially the ‘love of boys’ that appears in ancient thinkers and writers’ records, such as Plato and Aristotle and Herodotus and Xenophon etc. The so-called ‘love of boys’ is a translation of the ancient Greek word παιδεραστία. Many ancient sources explored its social aspects in ancient Greece. The most widespread and socially significant form of close same-sex sexual relations in ancient Greece was between adult men and adolescent boys, known as παιδεραστία. It is Harald Patzer and Michelle Foucault who gave this issue of interest to modern times and also provided an opportunity to generate interest in the academic field. The main purpose of this article is to look at the views and methodologies of how both two scholars recognize παι δεραστία and how they deal with it in their Die griechische Knabenliebe and Historie de la Sexualité. More over, this paper will be focused on the comparison of two views of German classicist Harald Patzer and French philosopher Michelle Foucault. Harald Patzer and Michelle Foucault also explain the pros and cons. Patzer's comparative study of different races has led to massive data sources for further studies. Foucault’s ‘innovative’ study provided a new opportunity to see the problem from the other perspective, compared with traditional view-points. Foucault, influenced by the theory of Nietzsche's concept of power, had a new perspective on the relationship between sex and power. Unlike the traditional ‘suppression hypothesis’, he emphasized the aspect of the 'production hypothesis' that power produces discourse on sexuality more and more. But Foucault's methodology, like the case of Patzer’s anthropological comparison and philological analysis, has also shown its limits in several ways. So, these shortcomings can be promoted by the study of H. Patzer and the process of complementing each other. In this sense, it's not a bad idea for the study of παιδεραστία as follows like that. Harald Patzer's view of historical-cultural phenomenon is expected to serve as a more empirically settling 'history of innovation' that was newly proposed by M. Foucault.-
dc.format.extent21-
dc.language한국어-
dc.language.isoKOR-
dc.publisher부산외국어대학교 지중해지역원-
dc.title그리스의 사랑 ‘페데라스티아’(παιδεραστία) -H. Patzer와 M. Foucault의 비교--
dc.title.alternativeGreek Love ‘παιδεραστία’ -Comparative Study of H.Patzer and M.Foucault--
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.18218/jmas.2018.20.3.123-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation지중해지역연구, v.20, no.3, pp 123 - 143-
dc.citation.title지중해지역연구-
dc.citation.volume20-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage123-
dc.citation.endPage143-
dc.identifier.kciidART002383830-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor파쪄-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor푸코-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor페데라스티아-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor호모섹슈얼러티-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor소년에 대한 사랑-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor권력-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorH.Patzer-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorM.Foucault-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorπαιδεραστία-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorhomo-sexuality-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorKnabenliebe-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorboy-love-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbio-pouvoir-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
사범대학 > 역사교육과 > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE