Detailed Information

Cited 11 time in webofscience Cited 12 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire -palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative careopen access

Authors
Yun, Young HoKang, Eun KyoLee, JihyeChoo, JiyeonRyu, HyewonYun, Hye-minKang, Jung HunKim, Tae YouSim, Jin-AhKim, Yaeji
Issue Date
5-Mar-2018
Publisher
BMC
Keywords
Quality of care; Questionnaire; Palliative care; Validation
Citation
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, v.17
Indexed
SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE
Volume
17
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/11818
DOI
10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2
ISSN
1472-684X
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an instrument that could be used by patients with cancer to evaluate their quality of palliative care. Methods: Development of the questionnaire followed the four-phase process: item generation and reduction, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. Based on the literature, we constructed a list of items for the quality of palliative care from 104 quality care issues divided into 14 subscales. We constructed scales of 43 items that only the cancer patients were asked to answer. Using relevance and feasibility criteria and pilot testing, we developed a 44-item questionnaire. To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, we recruited 220 patients over 18 years of age from three Korean hospitals. Results: Factor analysis of the data and fit statistics process resulted in the 4-factor, 32-item Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC), which covers appropriate communication with health care professionals (ten items), discussing value of life and goals of care (nine items), support and counseling for needs of holistic care (seven items), and accessibility and sustainability of care (six items). All subscales and total scores showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha range, 0.89 to 0.97). Multi-trait scaling analysis showed good convergent (0.568-0.995) and discriminant (0.472-0.869) validity. The correlation between the total and subscale scores of QCQ-PC and those of EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL, MQOL, SAT-SF, and DCS was obtained. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the QCQ-PC can be adopted to assess the quality of care in patients with cancer.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kang, Jung Hun photo

Kang, Jung Hun
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE