Detailed Information

Cited 35 time in webofscience Cited 45 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of student self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing in nursing simulation: A quasi-experimental study

Authors
Kang, KyungjaYu, Mi
Issue Date
Jun-2018
Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
Keywords
Debriefing; Nursing; Student; Simulation
Citation
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, v.65, pp 67 - 73
Pages
7
Indexed
SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY
Volume
65
Start Page
67
End Page
73
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/11614
DOI
10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.030
ISSN
0260-6917
1532-2793
Abstract
Background: Student self-debriefing promotes self-confidence, helps to increase clinical performance, and is a more cost-effective method than is traditional instructor-led debriefing in simulation-based learning. Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness of debriefing-in terms of the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction-between an experimental group who received both student self-debriefing (SSD) and instructor debriefing (ID) and a control group who received only instructor debriefing. Design: This quasi-experimental study used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Settings: Two universities in South Korea. Participants: A convenience sample of 123 senior nursing students. The data were collected between 15 April and 9 June 2016. Methods: Differences in the problem-solving process, team effectiveness, debriefing assessment, and debriefing satisfaction between the SSD + ID group and the ID-only group were measured. Results: The SSD + ID group showed significant improvements in the problem-solving process (t = 4.32, p < .001) and debriefing satisfaction (t = 3.19, p = .002), but not in debriefing assessment (t = 1.67, p = .097) or team effectiveness (t = 1.84, p = .069) compared to ID-only group. Specifically, as the number of student sessions increased, we observed significant differences in problem-solving ability (F = 9.44, p < .001), debriefing satisfaction (F = 7.78, p < .001), and the subdomains of debriefing assessment: 'maintains an engaging environment' (F = 3.78, p = .025), 'structures the debriefing in an organized way' (F = 4.27, p = .016), and 'helps trainees achieve or sustain future performance' (F = 3.17, p = .045). Conclusions: Our results can be used to develop guidelines for effective debriefing following simulation in nursing education. Specifically, combining SSD and ID in simulation debriefing and increasing the number of SSD sessions could help improve the problem-solving process and debriefing satisfaction among nursing students.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
간호대학 > Department of Nursing > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Yu, Mi photo

Yu, Mi
간호대학 (간호학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE