Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 3 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Use of bone turnover markers in clinical practice for the management of osteoporosis in Korea: From the survey on the prescription pattern of bone turnover markersopen access

Authors
Ahn, S.H.Park, S.Y.Yoo, J.-I.Chung, Y.-J.Jeon, Y.K.Yoon, B.-H.Kim, H.Y.Lee, S.H.Lee, J.Hong, S.
Issue Date
2019
Publisher
Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Keywords
Biomarkers; Bone remodeling; Osteoporosis
Citation
Journal of Bone Metabolism, v.26, no.4, pp 271 - 277
Pages
7
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Volume
26
Number
4
Start Page
271
End Page
277
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/10694
DOI
10.11005/jbm.2019.26.4.271
ISSN
2287-6375
2287-7029
Abstract
Background: There has been interest in the clinical potential of bone turnover markers (BTMs) as tools both for assessing fracture risk and for monitoring treatment. However, the practical use of BTMs has been limited by their biological variability and difficulties in the interpretation of results. We investigated the current situation of application of BTMs by clinicians in Korea for the management of osteoporosis through a survey asking the patterns of BTMs prescription in clinical practice. Methods: The survey was conducted online using the “google survey” by the BTM committee authorized by the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Results: Total 108 clinicians responded the survey. Most of the respondents prescribed BTMs (80.6%) when they prescribed anti-osteoporotic medications (AOMs). The most frequently prescribed bone resorption and formation markers were serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (90.7%) and osteocalcin (65.1%), respectively. BTMs were mostly prescribed before starting AOMs (90.8%) and used for the purpose of evaluating treatment response (74.4%). Treatment response and compliance to AOMs were evaluated according to the change of absolute value of BTMs (55.1%). The respondents complained difficulties in the interpretation of BTMs (33.3%), the choice of proper BTMs (17.2%), and the proper sample preparation and handling (13.8%). Conclusions: In Korea, most of clinicians recognized the benefit of BTMs in the management of osteoporosis. However, there are limitations in the broad use of these markers in clinical practice. Therefore, a clear recommendation for BTM in Korea enhances their use in clinical practice. Copyright ? 2019 The Korean Society for Bone and
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE