Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

论审查起诉阶段非法证据排除程序构建A Study On the Stage of Investigation and Prosecution to Build Illegal Evidence Exclusionary Procedure20

Other Titles
A Study On the Stage of Investigation and Prosecution to Build Illegal Evidence Exclusionary Procedure20
Authors
사진원박상식
Issue Date
2019
Publisher
경상국립대학교 법학연구소
Keywords
Exclusionary rule of illegal evidence; Prosecution; Starting procedure; Human rights protection; 非法证据排除规则; 检察; 启动程序; 审查程序; 人权保障; 위법수집증거배제법칙; 검찰; 절차; 심사; 인권보장
Citation
법학연구, v.27, no.3, pp 123 - 139
Pages
17
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
법학연구
Volume
27
Number
3
Start Page
123
End Page
139
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/10261
DOI
10.35223/GNULAW.27.3.6
ISSN
1975-2784
Abstract
中国刑事诉讼法在修改的过程中,对非法证据排除的立法逐步完善,进一步保障人权方 面有了明显的进步和发展。具体来看,明确了实物证据与言辞证据非法取得的法律后果, 从修法的进程看,取证程序设计趋于严密,对于侦查机关的侦查行为的要求与控制逐渐加 强,检察机关主要通过对证据的审查判断,实现对侦查的监督与控制。从法律法规看,检 察机关对证据的取舍判断,主要通过内部的诉讼流程进行,如何操作没有相关的法律明确 规定,必然导致实务上操作的随意性,这个阶段如何启动非法证据的程序,审查的内容与 方法,需不需要相关人员的知情权等程序,对于规范检察机关诉前非法证据排除十分重 要,这些程序制度亟待构建与完善,如何在公诉阶段完成这些任务在整个诉讼过程中其决 定性作用,也是保证诉讼质量和犯罪嫌疑人人权保障上起到关键作用。现有的非法证据排 除规则构建是为了避免冤假错案发生,基于现实功利角度的考量,价值取向不同于非法证 据排除规则渊源的价值核心,即限制警察非法取证行为,这也是中国在刑事诉讼中非法证 据排除规则裁量标准存在较大的空间,针对现实问题而建立的衔接制度必然有一定的局 限,能否发挥实际效果有待实务检验,在探索中积累实务经验,探索特定环境中法律的发 展规律,逐步完善证据规则构建与应用,进而提升法律价值的飞跃,实现人权保障的机 能。
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
해양과학대학 > Department of Maritime Police and Production System > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Sang Sik photo

Park, Sang Sik
해양과학대학 (해양경찰시스템학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE