항공우주 핵심기술 연구를 위한 AHP 기반 설계기준 작성기준 구조화 방법론

초록

Aerospace core-technology research is typically carried out before full-scale system development, and the design artifacts available at the review stage tend to be sparse and uneven across projects. In such a setting, whether a written design criterion can itself function as a judgment basis—rather than merely as a description of design intent—becomes central to the quality of the critical design review. This paper presents a methodological procedure for addressing that question. Specifically, we propose a four-step procedure that (i) characterizes the functional role of design criteria in terms of judgment capability, (ii) derives candidate writing standards from systems-engineering references, (iii) organizes them into a three-domain, eight-item hierarchy (C1-C8), and (iv) assigns relative weights through an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) applied to expert pairwise comparisons. To illustrate the procedure, we report an application based on responses from twenty aerospace and systems-engineering practitioners, in which the “conditions and judgment capability” domain yielded the highest weight, followed by “clarity and consistency” and “traceability and scope.” A single illustrative design-criterion statement is also presented to show how the resulting structure maps onto an actual sentence. The contribution of this work is methodological rather than empirical: it offers a way to organize and weight writing-level attributes of design criteria, while empirical validation against design-review outcomes is left to subsequent work.

키워드