Prognostic Value of Combined Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand and p16 Expression Predicting Responsiveness to Radiotherapy in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell CarcinomaPrognostic Value of Combined Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand and p16 Expression Predicting Responsiveness to Radiotherapy in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Other Titles
- Prognostic Value of Combined Programmed Cell Death 1 Ligand and p16 Expression Predicting Responsiveness to Radiotherapy in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Authors
- 권민수; 김대환; 조기주; 김영철; 김진평; 정배권; 이종실; 서지현; 박정제
- Issue Date
- 1-Dec-2019
- Publisher
- 대한이비인후과학회
- Keywords
- Oropharyngeal cancer; Prognosis; Programmed cell death 1 ligand expression; p16 expression; Radiotherapy.
- Citation
- 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, v.62, no.12, pp 712 - 719
- Pages
- 8
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학
- Volume
- 62
- Number
- 12
- Start Page
- 712
- End Page
- 719
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/9994
- DOI
- 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2019.00619
- ISSN
- 2092-5859
2092-6529
- Abstract
- Background and Objectives This study examined the expressions of p16 and the programmedcell death 1 ligand (PD-L1) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) treated withradiotherapy (RT) to identify the correlation between p16 and PD-L1 expression, and to examinethe prognostic significance of these markers for OPC patients receiving RT.
Subjects and Method Forty-eight OPC patients diagnosed and treated at a tertiary referralhospital were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Patients were initially treated with RT orchemoradiotherapy (CRT) with curative intent and completed the planned schedule. Expressionof p16 and PD-L1 by primary tumors was evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and resultswere interpreted separately and dichotomized according to outcome analyses.
Results Of the 48 patients, 25 (52.1%) expressed p16 and 15 (31.3%) expressed PD-L1. Expressionof these markers showed a mutual positive correlation (p=0.046). Positive PD-L1 expressionwas associated with poor complete remission (CR) rates after RT (p=0.040). Positivep16 expression was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=0.004) but notoverall survival (OS) (p=0.192). PD-L1 expression showed no independent association withsurvival (p>0.05); however, PD-L1 expression tended toward poorer RFS, even in p16-positiveindividuals.
Conclusion There was a positive correlation between the expression of p16 and PD-L1 inOPCs. PD-L1 expression was associated with poorer CR rates after RT or CRT. PD-L1 alonedid not show an association with RFS or OS, but when combined with p16, it tended towardpoorer RFS, even in p16-positive cases.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.