Cited 0 time in
Triploidy that escaped diagnosis using chromosomal microarray testing in early pregnancy loss: Two cases and a literature review
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 박지은 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 박지권 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 강민영 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 조현철 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 조인애 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 백종철 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T15:32:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T15:32:13Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1226-1769 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2383-8442 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/9978 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | About 15% to 20% of all clinically recognized pregnancies result in spontaneous abortion or miscarriage, and chromosomal anomalies can be identiἀed in up to 50% of ἀrst trimester miscarriages. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is currently considered ἀrst-tier testing for detecting fetal chromosomal abnormalities and is supported by the absence of cell culture fail-ure or erroneous results due to cell contamination in pregnancy loss. Triploidy is a lethal chromosome number abnormality characterized by an extra haploid set of chromosomes. Triploidy is one of the most common chromosomal aberrations in ἀrst trimester spontaneous abortions. Here, we report two cases of triploidy abortion that were not detected using array compara-tive genomic hybridization-based CMA. The aim of this report was to remind clinicians of the limitations of chromosomal testing and the misdiagnosis that can result from biased test selection. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 5 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | 대한의학유전학회 | - |
| dc.title | Triploidy that escaped diagnosis using chromosomal microarray testing in early pregnancy loss: Two cases and a literature review | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Triploidy that escaped diagnosis using chromosomal microarray testing in early pregnancy loss: Two cases and a literature review | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5734/JGM.2019.16.2.76 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Genetic Medicine, v.16, no.2, pp 76 - 80 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Journal of Genetic Medicine | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 16 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 76 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 80 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002536410 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Comparative genomic hybridization | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Microarray analysis | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Karyotyping | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Abortion | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | spontaneous | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Triploidy | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
