Cited 48 time in
Optimal cutoff score of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) for detecting major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Do-Hyung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Young-Soo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, Tae-Won | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kwon, Oh-Young | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T15:04:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T15:04:31Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-03 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1525-5050 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1525-5069 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/9388 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background and purpose: The Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) is a useful inventory for screening major depressive disorder (MDD) in people with epilepsy (PWE). The cutoff score for detecting MDD has been reported with the range of >11 to >16. The aim of this study was to find optimal cutoff score of the NDDI-E for MDD detection by combining the raw data from previous studies. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SCOPUS to identify proper studies. Original researches, which tested the accuracy of NDDI-E for MDD detection in adult PWE, were recruited. We included the studies in which MDD was diagnosed by a gold standard structural interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). In addition, we included only the studies providing enough information for meta-analysis: number of PWE with MDD, number of total PWE, and sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Spe) for each cutoff score. After collecting data from included studies, we performed a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis using bivariate model. Results: We identified 13 validation studies conducted in outpatient epilepsy clinic setting. As summary estimates of test accuracy measures, the Se, Spe, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of NDDI-E for MDD detection were 0.81, 0.84, and 22.48, respectively. The analysis using the multiple thresholds model showed that the NDDI-E score of 13.2 was the best fit for MDD detection. When analyzing only with the seven data sets of the cutoff score >13, the Se, Spe, and DOR were 0.87, 0.80, and 25.72, respectively. Conclusions: The optimal NDDI-E cutoff score for MDD detection is >13. The information provided by this DTA meta-analysis will be a useful reference for applying NDDI-E in geographic areas where no NDDI-E validation studies have been conducted for their languages. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 10 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE | - |
| dc.title | Optimal cutoff score of the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) for detecting major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.12.006 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85059463819 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000461905800011 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, v.92, pp 61 - 70 | - |
| dc.citation.title | EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 92 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 61 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 70 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Review | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Behavioral Sciences | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Neurosciences & Neurology | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Psychiatry | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Behavioral Sciences | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Clinical Neurology | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Psychiatry | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SPANISH VERSION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | CHINESE VERSION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | VALIDATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANXIETY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | RELIABILITY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | VALIDITY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | PEOPLE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOOL | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Epilepsy | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Major depressive disorder | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Psychological interview | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Meta-analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
