Detailed Information

Cited 45 time in webofscience Cited 41 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Significance of perineural and lymphovascular invasion in locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery: Can perineural invasion be an indication of adjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors
Song, Jin HoYu, MinaKang, Ki MunLee, Jong HoonKim, Sung HwanNam, Taek KeunJeong, Jae UkJang, Hong SeokLee, Jeong WonJung, Ji-Han
Issue Date
Apr-2019
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Keywords
Adjuvant chemotherapy; Rectal cancer; Lymphovascular invasion; Perineural invasion
Citation
Radiotherapy and Oncology, v.133, pp 125 - 131
Pages
7
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Volume
133
Start Page
125
End Page
131
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/9301
DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.002
ISSN
0167-8140
1879-0887
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in rectal cancer. Methods and materials: Clinical data of 1,232 stage II-III rectal cancer patients from six tertiary institutions were analyzed. All patients were treated by long-course preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was performed for 962 (78.1%) patients according to the multidisciplinary team's decision. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were evaluated according to the lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) status. Results: Five-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the entire cohort were 84.1% and 71.1%, respectively. There is a significant difference in 5-year OS among both-absent, LVI+ only, PNI+ only, and both-present groups (89.1% vs. 77.9% vs. 67.6% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.001). RFS at five years was significantly different among both-absent, LVI+ only, PNI+ only, and both-present groups (78.7% vs. 58.7% vs. 44.6% vs. 38.6%; p < 0.001). The 5-year distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rate was also significantly different among four groups (84.6% vs. 61.4% vs. 54.2% vs 48.6%; p < 0.001). Although adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect 5-year DFFS in the entire cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the distant failure rate in patients with PNI+ patients (44.9% vs. 54.6%, p = 0.048), not LVI+ patients (65.0% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.487). Conclusion: Compared to LVI, PNI is a more significant prognostic factor in stage II-III rectal patients treated by preoperative CRT and TME surgery. The status of PNI rather than LVI could be an indicator for identifying patients who could benefit from adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kang, Ki Mun photo

Kang, Ki Mun
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE