Cited 18 time in
Comparison of cytological adequacy and pain scale score in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules for liquid-based cytology with with 23-and 25-gauge needles: a single-center prospective study
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yoo Jin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Dong Wook | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shin, Gi Won | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Heo, Young Jin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Baek, Jin Wook | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Choo, Hye Jung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cho, Young Jun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Jung, Soo Jin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Baek, Hye Jin | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T14:49:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T14:49:06Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-05-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2045-2322 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/9144 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of solid thyroid nodules (STN) using liquid-based cytology (LBC), the most appropriate needle size for LBC remains unclear. This study compared the cytological adequacy and complications associated with using 23- and 25-gauge needles in US-guided FNA of STNs using LBC. US-guided FNA was performed in consecutive patients by one radiologist to diagnose STNs >= 5 mm in the largest diameter. The one-sampling technique through a single needle puncture and multiple to-and-fro needle motions was used in each patient. The 23- and 25-guage needles were used consecutively each day. After FNA, the pain and complications experienced by each patient were investigated by a nurse, who was blinded to the information of needle gauge used. A cytopathologist retrospectively analyzed the cytological adequacy and cellularity of the cases. Of the 99 STNs, eight (8.1%) exhibited inadequate cytology (4 each with 23- and 25-gauge needles). The rate of cytological adequacy was not statistically different between the groups (p = 0.631). The mean pain scale values with 23- and 25-gauge needles were 2.1 +/- 1.3 and 1.6 +/- 1.3, respectively (p = 0.135). There were no significant complications in either group. In conclusion, both 23- and 25-gauge needles are useful in LBC because cytological adequacy and complications were not statistically different with both sizes of the needles. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP | - |
| dc.title | Comparison of cytological adequacy and pain scale score in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules for liquid-based cytology with with 23-and 25-gauge needles: a single-center prospective study | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-019-43615-7 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85065288001 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000467137300026 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, v.9, no.1 | - |
| dc.citation.title | SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 9 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Multidisciplinary Sciences | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | BIOPSY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | CRITERIA | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SAMPLES | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
