Detailed Information

Cited 16 time in webofscience Cited 16 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Data-driven synthetic MRI FLAIR artifact correction via deep neural network

Authors
Ryu, KanghyunNam, YoonhoGho, Sung-MinJang, JinheeLee, Ho-JoonCha, JihoonBaek, Hye JinPark, JiyongKim, Dong-Hyun
Issue Date
Nov-2019
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
synthetic FLAIR artifact correction; synthetic MRI; MDME; convolutional neural network
Citation
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, v.50, no.5, pp.1413 - 1423
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume
50
Number
5
Start Page
1413
End Page
1423
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gnu/handle/sw.gnu/8590
DOI
10.1002/jmri.26712
ISSN
1053-1807
Abstract
Background FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) imaging via synthetic MRI methods leads to artifacts in the brain, which can cause diagnostic limitations. The main sources of the artifacts are attributed to the partial volume effect and flow, which are difficult to correct by analytical modeling. In this study, a deep learning (DL)-based synthetic FLAIR method was developed, which does not require analytical modeling of the signal. Purpose To correct artifacts in synthetic FLAIR using a DL method. Study Type Retrospective. Subjects A total of 80 subjects with clinical indications (60.6 +/- 16.7 years, 38 males, 42 females) were divided into three groups: a training set (56 subjects, 62.1 +/- 14.8 years, 25 males, 31 females), a validation set (1 subject, 62 years, male), and the testing set (23 subjects, 57.3 +/- 20.4 years, 13 males, 10 females). Field Strength/Sequence 3 T MRI using a multiple-dynamic multiple-echo acquisition (MDME) sequence for synthetic MRI and a conventional FLAIR sequence. Assessment Normalized root mean square (NRMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM) were computed for uncorrected synthetic FLAIR and DL-corrected FLAIR. In addition, three neuroradiologists scored the three FLAIR datasets blindly, evaluating image quality and artifacts for sulci/periventricular and intraventricular/cistern space regions. Statistical Tests Pairwise Student's t-tests and a Wilcoxon test were performed. Results For quantitative assessment, NRMSE improved from 4.2% to 2.9% (P < 0.0001) and SSIM improved from 0.85 to 0.93 (P < 0.0001). Additionally, NRMSE values significantly improved from 1.58% to 1.26% (P < 0.001), 3.1% to 1.5% (P < 0.0001), and 2.7% to 1.4% (P < 0.0001) in white matter, gray matter, and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) regions, respectively, when using DL-corrected FLAIR. For qualitative assessment, DL correction achieved improved overall quality, fewer artifacts in sulci and periventricular regions, and in intraventricular and cistern space regions. Data Conclusion The DL approach provides a promising method to correct artifacts in synthetic FLAIR. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1413-1423.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE