Cited 0 time in
RNN, GRU, LSTM 모델을 이용한 낙동강 유역 잠재증발산량 예측 및 비교
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김상민 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-05T06:30:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-05T06:30:13Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1738-3692 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2093-7709 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/82284 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of deep learning-based time-series models for predicting reference evapotranspiration (ET₀), benchmarkedagainst the FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM) method. We developed and compared three representative Recurrent Neural Network (RNN)models—basic RNN, Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)—using daily meteorological data from 21 observationstations across the Nakdong River Basin in South Korea. The results consistently showed that LSTM and GRU models, which incorporate gatemechanisms, significantly outperformed the basic RNN model in prediction accuracy across all stations. The LSTM model demonstrated the best overallperformance, achieving the lowest average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.871 mm/day and the highest coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.767during the test period. The GRU model's performance was nearly equivalent to LSTM’s, making it a computationally efficient alternative. While therelative superiority of the models was consistent, the absolute prediction error varied depending on the distinct climatic characteristics of each station. Accuracy was highest at stations with stable wind conditions, whereas errors increased in coastal areas with strong, variable winds. These findingsdemonstrate that LSTM and GRU are robust and reliable data-driven methodologies for accurately predicting ET₀ across diverse climate environments,highlighting their high potential as effective tools for agricultural water resource management. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 12 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국농공학회 | - |
| dc.title | RNN, GRU, LSTM 모델을 이용한 낙동강 유역 잠재증발산량 예측 및 비교 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Prediction and Comparison of Potential Evapotranspiration Using RNN, GRU, and LSTM Models in the Nakdong River Basin | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국농공학회논문집, v.68, no.1, pp 43 - 54 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 한국농공학회논문집 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 68 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 43 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 54 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Y | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART003300443 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Evapotranspiration | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | deep learning | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | RNN | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | GRU | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | LSTM | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nakdong river | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0534
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
