Cited 0 time in
Performance Analysis of Point Cloud Edge Detection for Architectural Component Recognition
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Youkyung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yun, Seokheon | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-23T01:00:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-23T01:00:12Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2076-3417 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2076-3417 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/80097 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | With the advancement of 3D sensing technologies, point clouds have become a key data format in the construction industry, supporting tasks such as as-built verification and BIM integration. However, robust and accurate edge detection from unstructured point cloud data remains a critical challenge, particularly in architectural environments characterized by structured geometry and variable noise conditions. This study presents a comparative evaluation of two classical edge detection algorithms-Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN)-applied to terrestrial laser-scanned point cloud data of eight rectangular structural columns. After preprocessing with the Statistical Outlier Removal (SOR) algorithm, the algorithms were evaluated using four performance criteria: edge detection quality, BIM-based geometric accuracy (via Cloud-to-Cloud distance), robustness to noise, and density-based performance. Results show that RANSAC consistently achieved higher geometric fidelity and stable detection across varying conditions, while DBSCAN showed greater resilience to residual noise and flexibility under low-density scenarios. Although DBSCAN occasionally outperformed RANSAC in local accuracy, it tended to over-segment edges in high-density regions. These findings underscore the importance of selecting algorithms based on data characteristics and project goals. This study establishes a reproducible framework for classical edge detection in architectural point cloud processing and supports future integration with BIM-based quality control systems. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
| dc.title | Performance Analysis of Point Cloud Edge Detection for Architectural Component Recognition | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/app15179593 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-105015531744 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 001569553300001 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Applied Sciences-basel, v.15, no.17 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Applied Sciences-basel | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 15 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 17 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Chemistry | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Materials Science | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Physics | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Chemistry, Multidisciplinary | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Multidisciplinary | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Materials Science, Multidisciplinary | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Physics, Applied | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | RECONSTRUCTION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | point cloud | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | edge detection | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | RANSAC | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | DBSCAN | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
