Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Biomechanical finite element analysis of a femoral neck system fixation construct for femur neck fractures and clinical implications

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHoon-Sang Sohn-
dc.contributor.authorSe-Lin Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorGu-Hee Jung-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-06T07:30:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-06T07:30:09Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.issn3058-6267-
dc.identifier.issn3058-6275-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/79642-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study assessed the structural/mechanical stability of fixation constructs with a femoral neck system (FNS) via finite element analysis after simulating femoral neck fractures and explored the clinical implications. Methods: We simulated subcapital, transcervical, basicervical, and vertical fracture models using a right femur (SAWBONES) and imported the implant model of FNS to Ansys (Ansys 19.0, Ansys Inc.) to place the implant in the optimal position. The distal end of the femur model was completely fixed and was abducted 7°. The force vector was set laterally at an angle of 3° and posteriorly at an angle of 15° in the vertical ground. The analysis was conducted using Ansys software with the von Mises stress (VMS) in megapascals (MPa). Results: The maximum VMS of the fracture site was 67.01 MPa for a subcapital, 68.56 MPa for a transcervical, 344.54 MPa for a basicervical, and 130.59 MPa for a vertical model. The maximum VMS of FNS was 840.34 MPa for a subcapital, 637.37 MPa for a transcervical, 464.07 MPa for a basicervical, and 421.01 MPa for a vertical model. The stress distribution of basicervical and vertical fractures differed significantly, and the basicervical fracture had higher VMS at the bone, implant, and fracture sites. Conclusions: FNS fixation should be performed with consideration the osseous anchorage in the femoral head, and this technique might be appropriate for vertical fractures. Regarding the VMS at the fracture site, FNS might be applied cautiously only to basicervical fractures with anatomical reduction without a gap or comminution. Level of evidence: IV.-
dc.format.extent10-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisher대한골절학회-
dc.titleBiomechanical finite element analysis of a femoral neck system fixation construct for femur neck fractures and clinical implications-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.12671/jmt.2025.00108-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Musculoskeletal Trauma, v.38, no.3, pp 133 - 142-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Musculoskeletal Trauma-
dc.citation.volume38-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage133-
dc.citation.endPage142-
dc.type.docTypeY-
dc.identifier.kciidART003227520-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProximal femoral fractures-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFracture fixation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFinite element analysis-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE